bbberlin
bbberlin
bbberlin

I’m not asserting that at all - what I am asserting is that is that the woman is being punished for her free speech, which is in direct contradiction to the principles of Switzerland. Lets be clear: she engages in no illegal activity, and by all accounts is fully integrated into the culture, language, and economy of

Moving to other places is immensely difficult, and doing your life in a different language is killer... honestly if more people spent time abroad, or heck, even if they did a little semester abroad, people would have a much different picture of immigrants.

Free-speech doesn’t protect you from private judgement, but it’s supposed to protect you from judgement by the government... i.e. being denied rights because of your speech. The government isn’t supposed to be able to punish you for voicing your opinion.

While this situation may not meet the legal criteria in a

It’s not the simple though... because the real-world result is mob rule by a Swiss HOA. There’s a reason we have things like Human Rights Charters, because realistically this system in Switzerland is reactionary, petty, and also exclusionary of minorities as the people “just don’t feel you fit in for some reason”

In a Counter-Insurgency, “how you win” is the “win.” The SEALS alone weren’t responsible for it, I think it’s pretty clear that conventional strategy failed. After nearly 2 decades of high-tempo SF operations hunting militants and “taking the head off the snake is there is little to show it for it.

To be fair, there is history of the SAS in Ireland that is sketchy, and though it was in the past, it isn’t as if it was a hundreds of years ago.

Drone usage is a problem because of the massive amounts of collateral damage that the programs caused, as a cheap “solution” in lieu of an actual counter-terrorism strategy involving regional development, commitment of troops, and work with regional partners. Was the drone program in part responsible for assassinating

John McCain’s daughter... like the same John McCain that Trump made fun of because he got captured in Vietnam. Yup.

I think that happens quite alot... I seem to remember John Oliver or another talkshow playing clips of an ambassador to a Nordic country admitting he had never been there.

I dunno... career diplomats (even the ones who aren’t at the very top positions) do tend to have massive rolodexes of powerful people, and people as well who are in operational positions and not just top political positions.

Ultimately the job is quite complicated... it’s not that I doubt the management experience of

Some of them... in theory important countries are supposed to go to professional diplomats who have long careers training for them for those roles.

Honestly no personal stake or particular interest in party, but it’s a professional interest... the policy posturing that countries take relative to their technical abilities is pretty fascinating, especially in the Asia Pacific region where NZ is located, and there are numerous contested sea borders.

While it’s

But it literally doesn’t. Israel couldn’t project force all the way to New Zealand; Israel has no ability to project force because its navy is tiny and defensive, and its airforce would require bases to attack from (of which there are none regionally, except NZ-ally Australia). Even if they landed exclusively

Yes, but the question is irrelevant, as it’s an insane to threaten violence on New Zealand, and also NZ is a tiny well-respected island nation in the Pacific with the closest “staging area” being it’s closest ally and buddy in a mutual defence treaty: Australia.

A combination of factors:

-colonial history, Algeria among them (and it wasn’t that long ago!)

I disliked Steven Harper but think alot of the hate of him was overblown... except his economic policy was objectively terrible. He doubled-down on a oil economy and took credit for Canada’s lucky survival through the recession (in part based on the harsh and internationally ridiculed Liberal banking rankings), and

That’s a pretty weak excuse though... the reality is that Canada sets the number of refugees it takes, it sets it low, and it takes a fraction of Germany’s by proportion, or Sweden (smaller than Canada!). Canada’s strict point-based immigration has actually been held up as a model by the AfD (extreme right-wing) party

Alt-Right conspiracy rhetoric is still a thing though: you have small-town candidates for AfD (the extreme right party) saying stuff like “the refugee crisis is a CIA plot to destroy Europe.” Neo-nazis know how to work within the system so their literal statement don’t cross the line legally.

The strength of Germany I

Yes, but people do get around it by being careful.... there is still garbage press like “Bild” (very comparable to the “Sun” papers).

Breitbart is expanding into Europe apparently... you guys are exporting it to Germany now. :/