bbbbbbbbbn
Bbbbbbbn
bbbbbbbbbn

Yawn

Have some nightshade berries, pissant

Oh please, Gayle was cooning

So...white people owned slaves and determined their lives, erasing their identity. Then white people later felt kind of bad about it, so they put up a sign to memorialise the enslaved. Then white people felt bad about that sign, and they took it out and put in a sign on the floor instead. Then white people felt bad

Europe played a large role in the destabilization of the middle east, so no, I don’t see either as better or worse, regarding the Syrian, Iraqi, Afghan, or Yemeni crises; they both suck, and Europe got more refugees because they’re closer and not because they’re so welcoming. Europeans and Americans also both loved,

Ew.

So...that’s supposed to mean something...significant.

Who's Billy Eyelash again?

The person couldn’t read the regular font, enlarged it, and a name or two got cut off. They’re not an idiot. I’ve worked at a call centre, and it’s stressful and boring at the same time. Mistakes can happen. They should have been able to take that person’s work out, but they weren’t sure that person was the only one

They had a bunch of rule changes, they’re working with new software that hasn’t been tested with this much traffic...and caucuses are onerous and chaotic. That all seems to track fine, but I guess none of that slakes a certain thirst for conspiracy and drama

You’re looking at it wrong. You need to get yourself a tinfoil hat first. Because some Democratic insiders don’t fancy a Sanders candidacy, there is OBVIOUSLY a deep state conspiracy to bring him all the way down.

She needs to keep repeating that at those rallies. Because of all supporters, save Yang’s, Sanders’ are the least likely to “vote blue no matter who”. By a huge margin, actually. All the other frontrunners’ supporters seem to have grasped the principle excellently. 

Yes, all the money she’s raised for Democratic candidates in the years since 2016 are irrelevant, only your personal feelings matter. That blue wave that got Democrats the House back, she played a monumental role in helping that along, arguably a much larger role than Sanders, since most of the candidates he endorsed

I never said she should shut up. I said she could have partnered with a brown person that had actually experienced what she's written about. It not only makes the writing more credible, it actually makes it better. Finally, it's mostly about PROFIT: white people can write whatever they like, but profiting off misery

I think people are more worried that someone relatively unconnected is profiting off a crisis that is currently ongoing, and taking up limited room in the year’s publishing roster that could have gone to someone with firsthand experiences. The fact that she started playing up a Hispanic ancestry to bolster her

Seriously, what was she thinking?

Right? Lakeith Stanfield was saying similar the other day in a British mag "as a black man, I don't always want to be on the frontlines", and I’m just thinking “then why didn’t you leave this role for someone who DOESwant to be on the frontlines’? What a ridiculous thing to say while promoting a movie about black

Ten year olds “get their fur up” when corrected in a “hostile manner”. If you’ve made a blunder that has offended someone, and are still more interested in your emotional state than in correcting your mistakes, then you just might be immature/socially irresponsible, or don’t actually think you did anything wrong.

I just have to say, you keep claiming you know Buttigieg is suspect and problematic, but you keep giving him all this airtime that makes me think otherwise. He absolutely doesn't belong anywhere in this ranking, and definitely not that high if he's included.

Take this article down! The first item alone is riddled with errors and paternalism