You are indeed on a public forum. As am I and any number of other people who have responded to you. That would be the "we" to which I referred (i.e., the collective group of people which make up this commentariat).
Battybrain
battybrain
You're on a public forum.
I'd argue in far greater percentage than most conservatives, who seem incapable of even noticing cognitive dissonance, but point granted.
Well, there's two things in response there. First, the Clinton's never benefitted from Russian connections in an election, and certainly never encouraged (at a press conference, no less) anyone to hack and release their opponents' information.
And that's an incredibly frustrating part of these whole dialogues— liberals are well aware of their own failings, because they actually look at the results of their efforts.
In which direction?
I've often wondered if Trump really even realizes he's lying. I mean, you have to have a base level of knowledge in order to lie, and its becoming increasingly obvious that isn't something Trump has.
You think she'll ever put two and two together as to why so many people despise her?
Indeed. Of course, that would require integrity. (On CNN's part— I think Cooper himself would have zero trouble never speaking with that woman ever again).
Oh, so you freely admit then that he's accomplished fuckall as President?
Appointing a Supreme Court Justice is not an accomplishment. Its picking a name out of a fucking hat.
Though somehow Sessions was still able to "advise" Trump to fire Comey. Sounds really recused to me.
Let's not start martyring Comey over here. At best, he's been a spineless, ass-covering goober. From there it only degrades, to showboating glory-hound or outright partisan meddler.
And the reason it's made headlines worldwide is because its so idiotically timed.
That assumes that Trump is capable of appointing a credible and competent successor. His Cabinet (Matthis and one or two others aside) would suggest otherwise.
I didn't, but I've seen that theory elsewhere, and it's by far the most plausible explanation to me, given Trump's personality.
It's possible, I suppose. But it seems like the kind of thing that would embolden people to either continue investigating or start leaking wildly at that point. Either way, this is a poor way of going about it.
username/comment synergy?
And that's really the big problem with ascribing any motive to him at all. You just can't figure him the same way you would any other politician or, indeed, functional human.