bassrockerx
bassracerx
bassrockerx

I’m glad they didn’t wimp out on going with the full retro wheels

That is the correct answer, although given his Land Rover affinity, he’ll probably go this route for 2-door convertible crossover:

Hahaha! And every auto maker will ask him to do a $10 weld.

This is the easiest Miata is the right answer in a while.  

The Suzuki SX4. A quirky and extremely off-road capable 4x4 hatchback, with a 3-speed auto that wouldn’t feel out of place in the 80's.

My mother-in-law would routinely call my wife’s various crossovers “Vans” and it drove my wife crazy.

The only reason he still has a job is so CNBC can drag his carcass out in front of a camera when something big is happening and give the absolute worst take you’ve ever heard before going back in storage for a few months.

The Chrysler/Plymouth Prowler.

In the Case of the Ionic5 I think they would sell just find being called anything. They happen to be one of the best looking vehicles on sale right now and would be my choice if I was looking for a smaller than my Suburban 5 door hatchback Sedan.

Yep and it drives me up the wall that anyone calls the Ionic5 an SUV, it is just a big Hatchback.

I assume the amount of people who cross shop the Acadia and the Yukon is very small. You buy the Yukon because it’s a Body on frame, v8, 4x4 suv.

You sure that’s not just the weight of the car crushing light waves and the resulting rainbow is the escaping visible light?

I love that idea but Toyota is too much of a Trump supporter to really jump ahead in the EV world, at least for now. 

This has already happened, some insurance companies won’t insure the cars at all. The people suffering the most are those who bought the cars before thefts became such an issue. 

Fairly odd omission from the article and actually what i googled immediately after reading the headline. 

It’s actually turning me off from buying a Santa Cruz.  While I prefer the Maverick, I was considering at least test driving a Santa Cruz because they are actually available.  Don’t think I can entertain buying something from such a shitty company.

Fix is add immobilizer at no cost. This has always been the fix. Cost is less than $200 per vehicle. Cost of denial is hundreds of millions in legal damages and settlements.

One thing I’ve never quite understood is that this doesn’t appear to be an issue in other jurisdictions. Other countries made immobilizers required by law and so Hyundai/Kia put them in their vehicles elsewhere. Doesn’t the government bare at least some of the responsibility for not properly regulating automakers by

I really think this has been the single largest complete fuck up by a major automaker in recent history, even over Dieselgate. The fact that they cheaped out on security to begin with, hoped it would go away, issued a half-assed “fix”, and are continuing to ignore the fact that they did anything wrong in the first

Drivers in Jacksonville, Florida, were shocked to see a yellow line pained down the middle of Interstate 95.