Dear, we’re not slow on any uptake. In fact, quite wise to the scam that's been played.

Neither is “transitioning” like an acting role respectful.

Being an ally dosent mean you can't or shouldn't call out bad behavior. In fact, much like a true freind, it's required.

No....saying Jenner’s trans identity might be fake is because it seems fake. People don't like Jenner because it seems fake. And you're right, that does hurt all sincere folks.

You’re right. “Transitioning” as a publicity stunt is a terrible and shitty thing to do. Jenner should take that attitude and shove it.

My point is that legalizing sex work solves a lot of problems created by criminalizing it that are not, in fact, inherent in the industry itself.

And neither is sex a vice, nor exclusive to adults.

“simulated”? Yes. They are actors.....after all. I think you're trying to make a distinction without a difference.

“From 1973 through 2008, nine surveys of women’s rape fantasies have been published. They show that about four in 10 women admit having them (31 to 57 percent) with a median frequency of about once a month. Actual prevalence of rape fantasies is probably higher because women may not feel comfortable admitting them.”

If it’s simulated, then your moralistic judgement on it applies only to you, freind. If it offends you, don’t look at it. No crime is committed from consenting adults filming a sexual scene. Or from other consenting adults enjoying watching the film.

So, if humans are trafficked now, when prositution is illegal.....you think legalizing it isn’t ok because it won’t completely solve the trafficking? How about make it less prevalent? Or more difficult? How about make it easier for trafficked humans to get out because the industry is out of the shadows? How about the…

“From 1973 through 2008, nine surveys of women’s rape fantasies have been published. They show that about four in 10 women admit having them (31 to 57 percent) with a median frequency of about once a month. Actual prevalence of rape fantasies is probably higher because women may not feel comfortable admitting them.”

If you can’t safely provide the offered services.....thank goodness government oversight does it’s job to shut you down. If only the U.S. could have the same.

No it's not. Low level attaché diplomatic staff from every country get away with far more just in the D.C. . If Olympic athletes can't be treated with as much leeway as paper pushers at a consulate in your country. Well, you probably shouldn't try to host an international event.

Not saying they didn’t. But pulling them off a plane flight for property crime and lying to police is bad optics. Bad diplomacy and bad hosting of the Olympics.

Never said that. You did. Asking a country that competed to hold the Olympics to be better hosts isn’t “Jingoism” child.

Part of being a good host to the Olympics is not harassing your guests.

A foreign government is harassing American citizens AT THE OLYMPICS they hosted. Disgusting.

No irony. A shit hole country is harassing American citizens. You see everything from a racists’ perspective.

There are no tourist dollars coming to at his shit hole. even less with this banna republic maneuver.