To support a ban on killing babies halfway born is human. To support the Hyde amendment is to uphold the freedom of conscience of fellow citizens. Bye bye straw man.

Given that our immune systems are designed to keep us alive everyday while cohabiting with millions of microbes, no there is no limit on what the human immune system can produce antibodies to. It's amazing enough to be magical. And that lends to conspiracy theories. But it is factual.

All the stars in the galaxy for you and whoever created that brilliant website!

ASD is recognizable as early as 1-2 months now. Way before vaccines are given. So yes, it is a coincidence.

Thank you for this. Stein may have attended medical school, but she is no scientist.

Lordy. Angel Merkle wears skirts..and she has some cankles......so does the Queen and Maggie thatcher before....FLOTUS looks awful in some of her dresses and on occasion, would be better served by pants. HRC is not Pallin. She's lived long enough to legit wear shapeless suits if she wants.

Nope. She doesn’t. But that's ok.

My advice to you; please stop. You’re only making yourself look ridiculous. All choices are restricted in some way. To believe otherwise is the hallmark of a child. The remark about “Margarita” is not only racist, but middle school level shade at best. And Given that most Americans can’t even manage eigth grade…

Restrictions are not the same as no choice. Quit already.

Not so. He’s stated many times he supports the laws of the land that allow for exercising of choice. Try again.

Yes, but judges have complete reign in their courtrooms to allow it disallow any speech, conduct or dress they see fit. This isn’t about wether the pin was political or not. It’s entirely about a judge’s right to run the courtroom how they see fit.

The attorney undoubtedly got five days not for the pin, but for the back talk about removing it.

It is standard in every courtroom for the presiding judge to set the dress code. Most judges aren’t this fascist, though. Most lawyers don’t try to piss of the judge hearing their clients’ cases for obvious reasons. I’d be furious if I was this lady’s client.

I have no doubt he wouldn't want to get it. Even with Trumps ten foot pole.

I really don't think he'd have sex with you, though.

Oh my. So we’re doing this again, are we? Redirecting one of the worst pieces of writing ever? For what? Please, children. Stop. Just stop. My generation is utterly ashamed of this drivel masquerading as literature. You will be as well. Best of luck, darlings.

Good. As a small business owner myself I can understand. Yelp is the mafia using crazy malcontents to further their profits and damn the consequences to others’ livelihoods. Also, saying someone committed malpractice IS a bit over the line. Say the wait was long and you didn't like his demeanor, but don't say he…

Selling and sharing illegal drugs are separate offenses.

This is nothing to be proud of.

My point is, the father is charged with drugging the victim. If the victim took the drugs intentionally, that charge cannot be upheld. Hence the relevance.