Yes, Slate will have all the details and we have to believe them.

This is good news for America. She wasn’t on the same page with what Trump wanted for the border or she wasn’t getting it done fast enough.

Do they define ‘ethical’?

Yes, it is. It’s just like categorizing them according to the owner’s race or sexual orientation and it’s wrong.

Swap one privacy-invasion service for another.  

Unfortunately, most of the people who read this site will end-up voting for one of the crack-pot Democrats who want the Federal government in your face all the time.

That would be the US Congress.  They gave the power to the banks decades ago and didn’t do anything except take their money to look the other way.

Seriously, what a dumb thing to write! She’s not an antisemite, unlike Ilhan Omar who has been an antisemite for years. 

More name calling, you’re so predictable.

I responded to dozens of comments so nice try. Most people here simply respond without looking to see if what they’ll say has already been addressed.

Actually, I’ve received more stars than responses.  I wouldn’t expect you to actually use real data to support your comments, though.

Wrong.

The first link uses the OEDC report that uses the 20 year old WHO report that’s already been debunked and proven not accurate.

Using the same debunked WHO report from 20 years ago.  Nice.

No, they’re not the same thing.  You can have the latter without the former.  In fact, people were doing it for quite a long time.

You’re totally wrong but I’m sure you don’t care.

‘Well-sourced’? You’re not just a moron, you’re illiterate. I said multiple times that those ‘sources’ all point back to one, 20 year-old WHO report that’s been debunked hundreds of times. Talk about embarrassing yourself, you’re not even capable of keeping up with the discussion!

Keep up, that 20 year old report has already been debunked.

Wrong.

Please keep up, your lists have been addressed already.