“We can’t give everyone free college! Because then rich kids would get free college!—Pete Buttigieg, somewhere, probably.

I work at a crummy gas station/ convenience store and we absolutely have a scanner. If we do, I can’t imagine why a 2 level(or more) bar wouldn’t. Yes, I can refuse sales ‘in good faith’ but if you’ve been carding people for ore than a week, you know what’s fake and what isn’t. Salty is right here, though I fi live in…

Look man if I am tending bar and some chick with a full beard saddles up I am not carding her and she's probably going to drink for free. 

1)Just wait until you get old and nobody bothers.

The woman was an inuit Alaskan.  The male was white.  Where have we seen this before?  

Alaska’s a rough place.

because his victim is native

You conveniently left out this quarters growth was twice predicted despite the shorting off the stock it has increased steadily the last month.

This whole art on the internet thing is weird. This may be an unpopular opinion, but I’m always weirded out by artists doing renditions of characters they don’t own, then getting upset when other people who don’t own that artwork then come along and share it, credited or not. I’m genuinely confused on how one is OK…

Trump is living the white people dream. Trashy McMansions drapped in gold from ceiling to floor, banging porn stars, lying about his taxes, and pissing off liberals and minorities.

I’m prepared to give some of these folks more of a pass than others. In the Rock’s case, since blowing up (and therefore being able to do things like simply deciding to take a role for the sake of working with a particular director), the man basically only makes one kind of movie: big budget tent pole movies—more…

It’s a lock that this story is going to get weirder before it gets normaler. 

Yes. Also let’s be clear minded a bit : Cyberpunk 2077 is portraying Cyberpunk. Cyberpunk is all about a decaying society. It’s not an agenda, it’s a sociological state. Feeling offended by a sociological state in a Cyberpunk work is like being offended by a bombed school in a WW2 movie.

And it doesn’t sound like *he* expects special adulation for being mindful of others, so there’s something that comes off as mean-spirited in that suggestion.

I think todays culture has lost its way to read intent, i think it should be obvious when something is trying to offend rather than it can be interpreted as much. 

Rather, and he’s not the only celeb to do this, it’s a guard against any accusations of impropriety. You see it a lot with married male celebs.

Because all this “senior blogger” does is stir shit. They are drama filled and don’t like it when a man gets credit for anything. Everything they blog about is just creating drama when there was none. Don’t even need to go back a page of her recent blogs too see that.

It makes no sense to get upset over imagery in a work of fiction until you know in what context the imagery is being used. Also, a depiction of a fictionalized world is likely to contain portrayals of real bigotry, especially one set in this universe, so it’s not appropriate to assume that just because bigotry is…

He may be doing it to avoid appearances of impropriety, or to ensure others’ comfort. But underlying those theories is the assumption that he would put his hands on these people were it not for one of those decent reasons not to do so. Is it too crazy to think that maybe he just doesn’t want to put his hands on other…

Why be such a buzzkill? This is really thoughtful of him. It’s not bare-minimum considering he really didn’t have to do it. He was going above and beyond to make sure he didn't accidentally make someone uncomfortable.