Until I read this, I didn’t realize that there are people that can’t hear when a tv is on. I just always assumed some just didn’t know what to listen for, or couldn’t isolate the source. Of course, now I’ve made the connection that some people just can’t hear certain frequencies, which is why they can’t hear certain…

yes it was, and it was perfect!

It was Philippe’s

I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that they actually threw in some CGI McKellen on Fassbender’s face. Amidst the rest of the bad CGI, I’d actually approve of this.

Getting to this late, but I’m surprised no one has mentioned this yet (I did a search of the threads and believe to be true, THANK YOU if I’m proven wrong). Anyways, Gimple said we’d see some version of Glenn or parts of Glenn — again. PARTS. OF. GLENN!!! I want to believe that you’re right that he made it under the…

It’s true that we don’t see Madison offer any reason why she stopped Alicia from helping. But I’m pretty sure that Madison’s sigh at the end of the episode was her mentally preparing herself to tell Alicia what she knows, and hopefully rehashing some of Tobias' wisdom. We don’t need to see that on camera because we…

Cyclops Marvel Now

I can't tell if function is driving form, or if they're actively trying to make it look like the visor that Cyclops wears in X-Men...

You need to look at http://www.nitrogenlogic.com/. Obviously the ideal solution doesn't require something quite this large, but this guy is off to a great start

I was convinced that this was what the 3rd movie would reveal. There were even pieces of the second movie that convinced me that there were levels of the Matrix as an added layer of control. Couldn't tell you what they are anymore though...

Nice paint job!

Came here post exactly this. This is the only acceptable option in my opinion, and I'm surprised the manufacturers haven't figured this one out. It's such a cheerful option from a time built by the optimism of 1950's futurism. And with all the noise dampening materials already in place on gas-powered cars, it…

but you can see the top/bottom... You just need to rotate the interface cube as shown at 1:30. No algorithm transformation required!

wanted to post this, but you beat me to it...

short answer from jalopnik: "the essential truth is that pretty much any vehicle making roughly these torque numbers (around 400 lb-ft) could do this"

If the problems you were having with your system were "software glitches," then it was more likely the case that your system wasn't programmed by a competent programmer. Those kinds of systems can be extremely reliable if programmed by qualified engineers or programmers. I might have suggested to have your system…

Vheeere aaare da stoooones?