bam5
BAM5
bam5

Okay

Oh, and thanks for the copy edit. When I said you weren’t exactly James Joyce, that was me emphasizing that your writing is clear and easy to understand.

Lol

Lol

Again, I understood every word. You’re note exactly James Joyce. And I just said why there was no point to letting single-payer advocates come to the table: Because single-payer wasn’t happening. There wasn’t enough support for it.

I understand what you wrote completely. My point is that you made a meaningless argument.

Because when Nintendo combines its handheld and console divisions, it can focus all its development resources on creating first-party games for one system.

We couldn’t even get the public option that was actually proposed to pass Congress (thanks, Joe Lieberman) and yet some people still think single-payer could have gone through if only Obama had led harder or something.

Not only did Gregg not become Secretary of Commerce, but he withdrew his name after being nominated. I have no idea what you’re going for here.

If Obama had FDR’s Congressional majorities, we might not be able to say that.

It’s a bit outdated, I’ll grant you. It’s not the Cold War anymore. Still, most of the world’s freest democracies are part of alliances that have the U.S. at the helm, by virtue of our massive military. It’s no accident that a lot of NATO members don’t bother to meet the defense spending targets, since they know the

Chait’s center-leftism doesn’t change the fact that Freddie DeBoer is an asshole.

Hi Donald.

In the first game, Kanto and Johto are in a Cold War-like situation where there is not travel between the two regions. By Gold/Silver, peace has been made, the wall has come down, so to speak, and residents are now free to travel.

NOPE NOT READING THIS ONE GOODNIGHT EVERYONE HAVE A GOOD WEEK.

And if that mentally ill man didn’t have access to guns, ten people would be alive today.

I almost, almost feel bad for Christie. He was so ready to be the loud tough guy in the race and now Trump has stolen all of his thunder.

The more I think about this, the more unfair these questions seem. Democrats have proposed reducing the corporate tax. Even President Obama was willing to trade a lower rate in order to eliminate some loopholes. Democrats are all about reducing the tax burden for low-income earners (see: EITC). I can even see a few

The estate tax only applies to the portion of an estate’s value that exceeds $5.43 million (which is the current exemption levels). Almost no one pays the estate tax except the wealthy, and I’m sure they have ways of reducing that amount.

In fairness, you can make any tax plan sound good if you cherry-pick it and omit the negatives (and don’t discuss potential outcomes). Even Trump’s plan.