Yeah that’s fine, we are all human and flawed, but then she appears to have written a book where she shows zero self-awareness and little consideration for the victims.

Wow, I didn’t know “you shouldn’t support abusers” was just the top of a slippery slope that would lead to us all falling prey to the Gestapo.  I just finished a history of the Third Reich, but I must have missed the part where what started it all off was the idea that you should maybe not offer public support and…

You want to “both sides” a man with a rape button? Weird position to take but follow your rapist supporting heart, I guess.

I think it’s relevant to acknowledge that Katherine Heigl was dealing with white men, which changes the power dynamic.  She also wasn’t the lead or titular character of any of the projects where she was alleged to be “difficult”, to my recollection. Pompeo being Grey definitely gave her legs to stand on in this…

So the Root published a lot more of the section in question, and after the “why did she say “yo, we went it at one day” question, I hit this:

I hear all the time from the thin blue line folks how “if you don’t do crimes you have nothing to worry about!”.  They throw out “well, they were a thug” as justification.  And here we have a woman who only happened to find herself in the wrong place at the wrong time by total accident.

It’s a very GOP-aligned point of view, “This is bad unless I do it! How dare you treat me the way I treat others!”

Because you uncritically and with no context shared a tweet from a thread where the writer blames McGowan’s own victims for her conduct.

This is the least surprising thing I’ve ever read about Rose McGowan.

I’m completely sympathetic to the idea that Democrats and liberals generally are capable of, and often do, act in ways that enact and uphold rape culture. What I don’t get is someone using that fact to come to the conclusion that Republicans and conservatives are a better alternative.  

How the hell did Trump get elected President? Oh right...

Oh god. This woman and her quest to get as much attention on her as possible at the expense of other victims.

Looking forward to her buying and repurposing all of Caitlyn Jenner’s campaign material for a future spurious gubernatorial run. I feel like those two deserve each other, since they’re both craven, soulless attention grifters. I’m sure they would get along like cats in a bag.

That’s nice, but it really doesn’t carry any water with me.

Yeah, they’re blaming the LGBT+ community for “not loving” a bigot who has repeatedly been a bigot (deliberately using businesses being boycotted by LGBT+ groups, how Gay rights is just about being able to take drugs publicly, suggesting transwomen aren’t as worthy as ciswomen etc).

This was the woman who basically said that trans women don’t understand womenhood, then flew into a rage when someone pointed out that her feminism ignored the specific “sum is greater than the parts” concerns of transmisogyny. Really got pissed about the idea that she might be considered “cis”.

So yeah, hardly a…

“Hurt people hurt people.”

What exactly was Malia Obama “in on”, Rose?

I wanted to respect her journey with assault, abuse, and mental health, but I had to stop following her on social media last year or so. I have a really hard time understanding her point of view when she seems to just want to be oppositional to everything and then claim the Big Conspiracy Against Her for when she gets…

She’s hurt so she’s going to make sure everyone else does too.