bahamut1987
bahamut1987
bahamut1987

At this point, he’ll have a coronary mid-reunion, and the Rebels will find his body with his tallywhacker stuck in the Falcon’s navicomputer.

Is this a trick question? He was in both Episodes VII and VIII, still doing the same job he did thirty years ago, like Ackbar and the rest.

I doubt he’s ever had to try.

As reported on this site, Denis Lawson already turned down reprising Wedge. Which just means there’s more room for the inevitable Sheriff Lobot: A Star Wars Story.

It’s been 50 years; you’d think he’d have gotten over abandoning L3 to some nerf herder by now.

But it’s equal-in-land-area neighbor, Kawanda, was completely denuded. Funny how randomness works, huh?

That was the reasonable assumption, but the point of the article is that Feige stated it doesn’t just apply to sentient life, so the assumption has been proven to be wrong.

I'm seeing double! One Glovers!

Hey, I've long mourned the fact that we didn't get Emily Blunt in the role. I'd be happy to watch her solo film, as well.

They didn’t even reshoot or adjust the film after Carrie Fisher died in the middle of postproduction. Why would they have listened to test audiences?

Sorry. Wrong reply.

The implications of those two bits of technobabble/Star Wars physics are exponentially more terrible than either alone. Without TLJ, Han just had to worry about not splattering the Falcon over a mountain range. Without TFA, maybe ships at lightspeed would crumble against planetary shields, like they did at slower

Studi paused for the perfect amount of time before delivering that final line, which was probably the part you were remembering.

Lastly, what sort of “shake down” is involved in a Medium post not even naming Hardwick? As to witnesses, some of the commenters in the previous articles said that a few people on Twitter had already confirmed Hardwick tried to have Dykstra blacklisted. I haven’t seen that in news articles, though.

Well, is Abrams or Kurtzman directing it yet?

But that was said in front of the entire company, so the audience would have included a significant number of the harrassed.

All the media outlets have been saying that those ancillary revenues will eventually offset the theatrical losses, but I haven’t seen any of them claim Solo will be a huge moneymaker in the end.

But fans like this are claiming that they didn’t see Solo (or, at least, that they didn’t pay for that movie when watching it) because of the last film. Whether that was a significant factor in its failure is impossible to quantify, of course.

It’s a little more accurate. Sure, the diehards will see a movie 5-10 times in the theater, but that pales in comparison to the amount they’ll waste on the related merchandise forever. Because Star Wars licensing now never stops, even when the next movie comes out.

His channel is mostly lengthy video game critiques, so five hours must have been a walk in the park in comparison.