People get intense about their wine though, I can see this being like an actual serious problem for them.

I honestly cannot believe that Obama hasn’t strangled Bush for what he left Obama with, but at the same time I have read that Bush is pretty chill as a person, so maybe they get along that way? Its the only thing I can think of when I see pictures of the two of them together.

EDT: So, the way kinja showed me this comment in the thread it looked like it fell under the “I am surprised he's alive” comment. rather than the "they get chummy together" comment. So I wrote a whole big thing that made no sense in context your comment was responding to. I am removing it now.

He shows up sometimes in those "Presidential" pictures where they show all the presidents who are alive being chummy and I am consistently shocked by it.

I very often forget Jimmy Carter is actually alive.

I said this in an above thread but I did actually use it when I went to London and I had an awesome experience, though I genuinely do not understand the whole “turn ON the hot water heater” thing, cause like... why would it be off? but people assured me that it was a thing outside of the US. Anyway, it was much…

As bad as it is for housing I used Air bnb when I went on a trip to London and it made everything so much eaiser, I was in the area I wanted (the Barbican) and it was INFINITELY cheaper than available hotels in the area. It’s pretty much a "Hate the sin, love the sinner" thing for me

There was that guy in NYC who lost his ability to rent in the city (like hes literally blacklisted) because he rented out his room on air bnb to these people who were going to throw this wild party (that ended up never actually happening)

I think the investors are pissed enough that if she did that they would make her go to Real Jail instead of the summer camp Martha went to

Your CEO better be thanking you profusely right now for saving their ass.

Thank you for the update! I will definitely look into it, as you know our news media here in the US is subpar so I haven’t known where to begin with looking into the fallout

Slander laws, he has to legally prove what happened to him or what happened to Corey or the accused person can sue him for slander. And he cant legally prove what happened because the people he would accuse cannot actually be convicted of doing it because the limitations are up. Its an endless loop, and confusing as…

He cant anyway because his statute of limitations expired, he specifically mentions it as to why he personally cannot go after the person/people, and acknowledges that he would be the first person to back up the survivor who is still within those limitations and can/does report it. My point was with the people who are…

tbh I just said that to cover the whole "MAYBE HE DID IT ON PURPOSE BECAUSE HES ____" people because I had talked about Haim and his connection to RDJ. I figured you would be in the same boat (and most people honestly but I wanted to ensure against the "WHAT IF")

They are the ones that had her wear the wire. It honestly boggles the mind but yeah, it wasn’t until his coconspirator was arrested for a different sexual deviance that it even came out.

The locking of the door did absolutely make me uncomfortable and I couldn’t figure out why. I am glad for you pointing it out because I just dismissed it after a second of “why did he do that its fucking weird and creepy” As for RDJ in general Haim stated in an interview that he lived with RDJ and Sarah Jessica Parker…

He may mean it in terms of what the law defines rape as, which in the US is defined as Penetration of the vagina or anus with any body part or object OR oral penetration by a sex organ of another person without the consent of the victim. so if say he was molested- but not penetrated- technically by the current…

I only peripherally know about the large scandal there because I watch 8 out of 10 cats, were the people who stayed silent (or the ones who were still alive because I know the person committing it died so I don’t know about the rest) prosecuted by the law for their compliance? It may be that just because its a law…

True, it is very easy to support a law that ends in what would be a good thing for this specific situation but it does open the door for what could be a series of “snitch” type laws, and honest misunderstandings (perhaps a couple that consensually uses impact play in their relationships and a separate party becomes…

Someone else mentioned that its possible those laws only apply to educators and doctors. If that is true of California (or any state really because not reporting it EVEN if a child tells you not to is so fucked up since it opens the doors for more children to be harmed) law makers need to have a serious look at…