It cracks me up remembering how I considered my money MINE - it was my parents' JOB to get me necessities...my paycheck was solely for fun! I would have been so pissed if they had suggested otherwise. What a shit I was.

Breaking: certain segments of the population like to watch women orgasm on video.

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/… an interview with Woody back in 2001. He says a lot about it here.

But in a controversial move, state's attorney Frank S. Maco announced in 1993 that while he found "probable cause" to prosecute Allen, he was dropping the case because Dylan was too "fragile" to deal with a trial. Mia agreed with the decision, he said.

Woody Allen was NEVER charged with a crime. This is because an independent panel of psychiatrists determined after a six-month investigation that no abuse took place. One, one single solitary prosecutor was willing to go forward with the case, but decided not to because he didn't have enough evidence.

What "lead investigator" are you talking about? Leventhal? If so, that testimony (from the Yale clinic) was considered "inconclusive" by the judge in the case, and he also called into question the ethics and credibility of that investigation.

Yeah, I forgot that Woody Allen funds the Connecticut State Police and Yale.

Yeah, for real. I've never understood the "wanting attention" accusations applied to people that publicly say their parents abused them. No one wants *that* attention. Dylan, Ronan, etc. have nothing to gain from this, and a lot to lose.

Actually, she did credibly convince the investigators. They decided not to pursue the case because they didn't want to put her through the trial. Her story has been amazingly consistent over the years, and there are multiple witnesses to Allen's weird behavior around Dylan on numerous occasions. He was in therapy for…

I take your point (and don't necessarily agree that her mental state is relevant), but... Of course she drove the allegations. The child was 7 years old, was she going to do it herself? I can't imagine a child molestation case being brought as far as this one wouldn't have a very determined parent behind it.

Jesus fucking Christ, Stephen King, really? Fucking really?

Purely as a speculation, it might suggest, that he has a strong lawyer and PR team and he was told never to say a thing on the subject himself. This, in turn, might suggest that there is something he'd better not talk about. While I agree about everyone judging and jumping to conclusions, still, it seems somewhat more…

I wrote in a separate post I've never seen anyone hate anyone like Mia Farrow hates Woody Allen. I mean, no judgment. But she HATES that guy.

I think "wanting attention" is a pretty flimsy excuse for bringing this up, and subjecting her children/family to all of this negative attention. It just doesn't add up for me.

I have no idea who to believe in this whole mess, except to feel sorry for Dylan Farrow that no matter what is true, she's suffered a lot of pain at the hands of parental figures. But I can still see some possibility of truth to the fact that Mia Farrow would continue to bring these things up, if only because the only…

I've never heard Woody Allen say anything about any of it. I know people defend him... but I've never heard Woody himself say anything one way or the other. I don't know what that means... If I ignore it; it'll go away?

What still bugs me is that, if Woody's camp is claiming Mia made this up to gain custody, why on earth would Mia & Co. still be talking about it today? She won the custody battle, there's no reason to drag this story out today if it weren't true. It doesn't do anything for them but subject them to public scrutiny over…

That's been my thought as well because in my mind, a person who is willing to ignore or break from one set of social norms (especially in such a serious transgression) seems likely to be willing to break others.

Except, it wasn't his adopted daughter. It was Mia's. With another man. Still sorta creepy? Yes. But Woody was never at any point her father.