All I got from this article is that Bill makes most of his living space decisions based on where the booze is at and how much he can purchase?

I'm not disputing that reading someone else's texts is invasive, but it's also ignorant to ignore the reaction it caused. Whether it was his or her fault, the relationship is a mess when one of you is digging through the other's messages and the other is purposefully hiding all the details of her relationship with her…

I think that’s giving her a significant amount of credit here, it should be plain that her response to the situation (even if his initial response wasn’t great) was truly awful. I agree that, initially, she deserved the benefit of the doubt. But her reaction was to completely shut her fiancé out of the situation and…

Right, I completely agree. Even if the writer of that letter over-reacted at first, that his partner’s response was to cover her tracks MORE and tell him LESS is a massive red flag.

True, though "flipped the f out" might be a bit strong, but who knows? Still, that type of reaction is deeply concerning. "I know this upsets you, so I'll just do it in secret, okay? Cool," is not the appropriate reaction for anyone to have in a good relationship, whether the OP is being overly concerned or not.

Cheesecake Factory too low TIME TO RIOT.

#3: I agree that you shouldn’t hold it against your fiancée if she’s texting an old flame, but if she says she still has feelings for him, texts him constantly, deletes his texts immediately (!!!) and doesn’t tell you when she is with him (!!!!!!!!!!!) to “not upset you” (!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?) I think there is a signific…

This is great, now tell me when I don't have to wait 20 minutes to play a match so laggy as to no longer be Street Fighter despite both of us having "5" connections.

Fourth Cubs fan here, I'd just like to say it's still funnier the White Sox didn't sign him.

This answers all the questions I had about this.

NAILED IT

It’s... it’s the title of the games. The title.

Hey. Fella. No.

I have to believe, to remain sane, that those people did not know that the kid was having an allergic reaction or that the stewardess told him “There are dogs on every flight”. Did the stewardess accidentally drop a massive bombshell there? That all airplanes are powered by dogs? WAKE UP SHEEPLE.

This all ignores the fact that no Fire Emblem story has ever been good! I love every Fire Emblem, but I’ve never played one for the story.

He made Yu Yu Hakusho as well, which most likely helps, not to mention all that Sailor Moon cash.

I concur with the rest of these replies in that very few people actually think The Witness is worth $40.

I haven’t found Conquest to be any more difficult than the pre-Awakening FE games at this point (I’m on mission 17, I’ve had to save scum about 7 total times total across 3 missions). But if you’ve only played Awakening I imagine it’s a real shock to be without the ability to grind.

I've seen a lot of people call Conquest difficult, but I don't think it's any harder than, say, the first GBA FE game so far (On mission 17). Can someone be more specific about what they find to be harder than the usual FE game? Is it just that you can't grind?

But... why are you on Kotaku?