It looks like the bill would classify loot boxes as unfair trade practices as defined by the FTC. How does that work?
It looks like the bill would classify loot boxes as unfair trade practices as defined by the FTC. How does that work?
Nobody is actually 25 IRL, it’s too round a number. I’m guessing 14.
I get it, folks like their weapons to stay the same, so I feel for them. This will hurt.
“X PlayBox X. Fun for all ages.”
I only played Halo 3 and Halo ODST with Grunt birthday party enabled. So rewarding.
Seems likely there would be unintended consequences of this.
Post-snap, my guess is healthy food options were harder to come by.
They probably don’t care (that much) if it doesn’t sell.
Transcendence
If the end products (i.e. the games):
Great! I hope it works (really).
Also, is his jacket different now?
Last week I read ahead a lot of the new Drifter Lore (i.e. without earning it in-game) on Ishtar Collective and there’s a lot of filling in the blanks of the Drifter’s past.
Calling the Vanguard “bureaucratic” seems overly generous.
Gita, as an FYI, “predatory” pricing is actually setting a price so low that your competitors aren’t able to sustain the low price, because their revenue < expenses, and thus they go out of business.
Achieved Apex
This.
I see your point on viewing it from a larger societal perspecitive, but I responding to lazarus’ implications that folks in the military are getting things for “free”. That’s not how I viewed my experience in the Navy.
I think I understand what you’re saying, but like you said, I guess I had a different perspective.
No no, read what I wrote again. I didn’t really say opinions should be revered.