Problem is, if you oil a lock, dust will clog it and you’ll lose the lock. You need to use graphite, not oil.

An offline test would be interesting (also, with some good mirror outside changing the view direction to see how much of it is optical and how much “recreation” of what it assumes it should be seeing in that position).

This. Usually the only person qualified to choose the proper tool is the one that will use it. Details matter, similar looking tools are just that, similar looking. In many ways, tools are more personal than a perfume or cologne.

“you know nothing about optics”. Done!

If it keeps on burning, rolling on the river may do it.

— nevermind, this comment went obsolete, but kinja won’t let me delete —

Tester: The battery lasted weeks! 

“🤌🤌”

“Brasileiro”. Not brasileño, nor brasilenho.

“Queso” has no meaning in Brazil. Queijo is cheese. “O Queijo” (the cheese) sounds very like “occasion” (except for the final “n”).

For casual readers; let me stress that cake it’s a direct translation for “bolo” here (Brazil). It’s not that “bolo” is a special type of cake or a cake done certain way (I’m sure the author know his stuff, but maybe some reader can wrongly assume that because of the word swap in certain lines). Also, “Brasileños”…

I assume it’s a rethorical question

https://lifehacker.com/look-at-these-safety-color-charts-before-you-buy-your-k-1846684366

Here, some relevant data to back you up:

--- nevermind, already posted a link in another comment ---

I had some success running old programs I wrote many years ago with DosBox. Even ones that used special video card instructions worked well. Perhaps it worth a look. There’s a fork that works well with printers too.

“AdBlock Plus - I can’t believe it wasn’t in the list.”

nevermind

Even with ounces (if you say “1 ounce this” “1 1/2 ounce that”) I can understand, but when you mix two units, can’t avoid math (that’s the problem that SI solves, you change scale only). Also I find interesting things like “one hundred (100) per cent (100)“ :D

I find your article very useful. The only “complaint” is that comparing grams with ounces requires extra conversion work for me, outside USA.