“The internet—contingents of both good-hearted true blue bomberheads and less well-meaning 40-year-old YouTube opportunists who rant about Captain Marvel”
The rest of the world thinks it’s terrific that you think there’s any discernible difference between you freaks.
Babymech
babymech
We do remember! We remember that Kamala got her cop ass booted and that Bernie is the front runner.... good times.
Well, I mean... the Uber guy is probably still making a shitty wage and being exploited by Uber, while the founder and former CEO is probably extremely rich and has no actual worries, so... uh.
Of course there are people in Sweden like this! The third biggest party in Sweden is the racist shithead party! This guy probably came to the US in order to live more comfortably as a racist, in a country where the racist shithead party is in power, but he was almost certainly a racist before coming to the US.
“Epileptics are all weirdos. They’re up there with the Asians.”That’s great. I have no clue what it means but it’s great.
Why would you respect what she’s doing? What is there to respect about her calling epileptic people weirdos that are ‘up there with Asians’? Why do you, personally respect that?
1) I think it’s fair to say the American voting population harbors anti-semites, just as I think it’s fair to say it harbors sexists - but maybe that’s too pessimistic; maybe you’re right that it would be out of bounds to say that there is a lot of antisemitism in America. I don’t know. 2) Lots of people have…
Keep up - we’re talking about what was said before the debate. Since they disagree on what was said they were both forced to basically call each other liars once on stage.
There are two interpretations of the very open-ended statement attributed to Sanders. The first is yours, which is reasonable - he made a tactical / political argument that tide had turned against a woman candidate for US president, which might be wrong but not out of bounds to suggest. The other is that he meant that…
Not sure that that is a broadly valid interpretation. If Sanders told Warren that he thought she was in a bad position to run for president, to discourage / intimidate her, that’s him playing politics. If he told her that no woman could have what it takes to become president, that’s him being a shitty dude with shitty…
But, uh... he said that a woman could win. How can he say that he believes a woman can win and at the same time not imply that Warren is a liar, since she’s accusing him of not believing that?
Agreed, except I also think there’s a non-zero possibility that Warren herself at the time understood those comments as innocuous in the context of Sanders’ behavior and support for Warren, and the Warren camp (with Warren’s blessing) now decided to spin those comments into their ugliest version for tactical reasons.…
The Sanders campaign said that Warren’s politics were bad. The Warren campaign said that Sanders is a bad person. Maybe both charges are fair game for you, but I think you can see how some supporters may see the one as dirtier than the other.
1) Why are you saying her credibility was damaged by this? She got her bump in the polls, right? 2) No matter what was said in the meeting, it is pretty dishonest to imply that Sanders actually believes that no woman can win the presidency, since he’s been on record several times before refuting that notion. At the…
I FAIL TO SEE THE RISK BECAUSE NOTHING WENT WRONG
Yes, and that’s why you don’t go there. To potentially fuck with the security people, the cleanup crew, the people running the show who don’t give a shit about games but are doing their jobs keeping the lights in the right place - makes these people disdainful pricks who could have stayed home.
Don’t buy anyone anything. What have they ever done for you? They’re not fun; not like the families in your stories on TV are fun. Fuck ‘em. buy yourself a Ring camera and a gun; a couple of guns! HAPPY THNAKSCVRHSITMAS
A bad candidate talks to a bad blogger in the romantic Christmas comedy of the season.