I am a satisfied LastPass user (and pay subscriber).

I could get behind a ban of veils for covering the face in public. Anything beyond that is too far.

They never gave it a chance.

Hey dipshit, what Comedy Central wants to do is to sell ads. Just like Gawkervision wants to sell ads and get me to buy shit from Amazon through your portal. Plain and simple. Is Gawker interested in “providing a breadth of opinions” if they aren’t leading to clicks and ad sales? Fuck and no. Jesus, this idiotic…

Watch the first 2 or 3 shows. He was all serious and professional. Some director / producer got to him and said, “this thing isn’t going to work with you doing your job quietly and professionally. More frat bro antics. More roach eating.”

Doesn’t seem to show wallets. They all definitely have their watches, but I can’t remember if they said that their watches were stolen. They made a point of saying that their phones and credentials were not stolen.

He’s recanted that part of the story. Says that the guns were just pointed at his head, not pressed against it.

I don’t think that it shows them with their wallets and/or watches. I could be wrong, but I’ve seen the video, and no one has said, “look there are their wallets and watches.”

Even the best pot brownie (or any pot infused goodie) does not taste like a normal brownie.

For a few weeks this winter, they were filming a movie around the corner from us Turns out it was Who Killed JonBenet? I was a little disappointed that it was a Lifetime movie, but it didn’t look totally small budget; more like mid-budget.

What fucking convictions? It’s social media PR, pure and simple. So where do these people draw the line on their convictions? If a person said that the were voting for Trump, would they sell to him? If a person said that she didn’t know if she would vote for Trump, but she thought that some additional scrutiny of…

I knew you’d be back. :-)

Keep it coming. You just can’t stop yourself. Aren’t you feeling a little out-of-control by now?

I love, love, love you. You have nothing but ad hominems. You’re willing to constantly attack me personally—for what reason, I don’t know—but can’t be bothered to spend even a minute refuting what I say. More than ever, I know that there’s no data. I’m not even certain what you thought was so controversial about the…

Your response is so peculiar. I asked for information, and you immediately went on the attack. Joivy, however, didn’t think that the 5 second posting of a link was such an imposition. Somehow the word “Trump” in my screen name seems to have short-circuited your brain. Also, I love that you couldn’t stop responding…

The company essentially blames the exchange participants for being sicker than they expected. They want healthy members who won’t actually need the insurance they’re buying.

Oh Simpsons’ screenshots, is there anything to which you are not applicable?

So behind all the needless bluster, the long-story-short answer is that you aren’t even familiar enough with any real data or studies that you claim exist to provide me a place to search let alone a link to the actual reports. And the reason for that is it likely doesn’t exist except in, at best, an accumulation of…

If they’re so common and easily accessible, then you could have a link posted in seconds. I’m not trolling, I’m legitimately interested in learning if they exist, since I’m willing to bet that they don’t except in some anecdotal form. I did do some Google searching, and no actual evidence came up.

You keep saying that, but you don’t seem to have any actual evidence to point to as to where those statistics are kept. Point them out, and if they are what you say they are, I’ll happily say that I was wrong. I’ll be willing to bet you that I’m not. Simpleton.