Uhhh well, if you take that stuff out, the interview reads like a much more awkward situation. The interviewer says a little joke, and the subject just jumps right to the next question. It reads like an awkward transcript, rather than a conversation. I think pretty much every media outlet in the world transcribes…

That's not even remotely true. The first was a classic, with lots of gravity to its silly story, etc. Ooze was way campier, and perhaps more fun at a really, really young age, but doesn't stand the test of time nearly as well as the first.

Clearly the world is in a strange place when a movie starring Robert DeNiro is somehow much, much worse than a movie starring Johnny Knoxville.

I've seen others point this out, too, and honestly… I get what you're saying, but you're not the first/only person to point it out, and I'm not even sure the anger is justified, here. I think Morgan made it clear that the person he spared took her as the hostage, which put her in jeopardy - but his overarching point…

I will say, though… where the fuck has Aaron been? He's been missing basically for the past few episodes. I agree that some of the relationships are really not developed, when they should be.

I like the Aaron character a lot and hope he survives. I think there's clearly an issue of subtext if they kill off gay characters in close succession like that (it'll seem intentional or political, at the very least). More than that, I think it'd be like killing off all the Alexandrians we know/care about - the only…

Thanks for clarifying quickly. My eyebrows were beginning to rise so high I thought they might fly off my face.

A great message?

If it's any consolation to you, one of the producers on the talk show afterwards said there would "definitely" be an answer about Daryl next week.

My point is that there's an inherent problem with a Batman that walks up to someone and says, "Do you bleed?" as a threat. That's just utterly ridiculous. There's many problems with the film based upon the reviews, but I feel like even the trailers should give you a sense that the movie's a total mess. Everything is…

Haha - he really commits to the cause.

Oh my god, they're still making those Pirates movies? I didn't even want to see the last one or two of those. Those movies weren't good.

While it may be true, it's also not really healthy for an individual to respond/think in that way. There isn't all that much that IS healthy about celebrity lifestyle, but not having a better stake in the work you're doing and devoting to energy to besides a paycheck is also a good way to feel hollow and unfulfilled.

They chose to be in this movie, likely based on the script and premise that was described to them. It's possible, I guess, that the movie changed drastically after they were already signed on in ways they couldn't control, but, I still think it's a valid question to ask even the actors.

People were complaining about Gal Gadot? Exactly what about Gal Gadot doesn't scream, "perfect goddess"?

I think you're being a little sensitive there.

I resent putting Keanu Reeves in the category with these others. He may not be the best dramatic actor, but he can certainly be one most righteous dude that goes on excellent adventures. Also, he's a great PHYSICAL actor in terms of action.

I'd personally rather Keanu Reeves keep doing John Wick movies (unless they become bad), rather than put a superhero costume on. I do absolutely adore Keanu Reeves though.

Her last attempt at playing a (transgender) male didn't end up super well, so I'm not sure that this is true…

Wait, did the trailer really not clue you in on the quality of this?