avclub-eede55069a8d3430b54730901f49c230--disqus
Semi-bored torontonian
avclub-eede55069a8d3430b54730901f49c230--disqus

Whoa, is Donald Trump Charlie Sheen?

I'm imagining it more like that Dark Knight scene where the Joker sets fire to the mob's giant pile of money.

MY BOYFRIEND IS NOT A RABBIT

Is Fantastic Planet the first animated movie to get the Criterion treatment?

Awwwww.

*coughs dramatically, dies*

I've recently rewatched The Big Short, so he may have been on my mind.

I actually think the Court is really nicely balanced right now, in terms of ethnicity, race or gender. There's always a danger in making identity into the overwhelming criteria for an appointment of this (or any) magnitude.

Thank you. The Shamrock Shake is strange and scary to my Canadian eyes.

I dunno, from what I've read, Garland looks like a reliable enough candidate. Ideally any Supreme Court judge should lean towards the centre, and with Scalia gone, there's no real need to nominate someone more "radical."

It's scary because that's how "I just want to watch the world burn" types like Trump are born.

Look, the Obama question was bait, I just want to know about the shakes.

WHAT ABOUT SHAMROCK SHAKES?

Two questions:

Thank you! I would have accepted Macbeth, too.

It's certainly very presidential of him to only surround himself with sycophants.

Yeah, some of the darker corners of his subreddit are pretty disturbing.

Yeah, that's what's worrying me most - that the other side doesn't look much better than Trump's side.

I'm worried that Trump may NOT lose to Clinton. At any rate, Bernie will basically have to personally implore each and every one of his supporters to vote for Hilary.

I think the party is going to implode either way. The real danger for the GOP is that a Trumpist 3rd party will syphon votes away from them and will irrevocably alter the Congressional makeup. They narrowly avoided that by incorporating the Tea Party, but if they refuse Trump the nomination, that's not going to happen