hulu
So, I was checking out Hulu.com, the new corporate approved video site, and it turns out that is one of the full length movies you can view over there. Kind a cool. Also, kind of sad if this is the best they can do.
hulu
So, I was checking out Hulu.com, the new corporate approved video site, and it turns out that is one of the full length movies you can view over there. Kind a cool. Also, kind of sad if this is the best they can do.
No, it's not that simple. See, in Star Trek IV it's Scotty saying, "Captain, thar be whales here!"
In Defenase of Star Trek IV
To start, the environmental message is completely over the top as you all point out. That at least deserves to be admitted. However, it is not a terrible film overall, and in my opinion, one of the better entries in the Star Trek series of movies. It actually has a decent story that…
Generally
I enjoy the Friday Buzzkills. But that G.I. Joe stuff really bummed me out. So, they really are buzzkills. ugh.
Well done
Just a great article. Nothing else to say.
For what it's worth, I meant expendable characters still on the show. Boone and Shannon and the other couple are already gone. At this point we've pretty much already gotten rid of all the jokers—as long as we're not counting the background extras.
HOW WILL WE GO ON WITHOUT KARL?
OMG KARL GOT KILLED. HOW CAN THE SHOW POSSIBLY CONTINUE?
I was surprised how bad this was.
Posey's performance only makes sense if she were playing a schizophrenic moron. Isn't she supposed to be the straight man here? Also, did the director tell her that everything gets better when you ENUNCIATE, ENUNCIATE, ENUNCIATE?
Why?
Why would I want to want this? I never saw the original, and I don't see the appeal of this. Can it really be about movie violence when it is simply devoted to violence without (apparently) being about movies?
If Jesus is inside me, I hope he likes burritos, 'cause that's what he's getting.
That's certainly one way to interpret it, and again, I'm not trying to argue that I have the absolutely correct interpretation. Your view, however, raises the time line issue that really bothered me about this episode. At what point does Juliet come to discover that Ben is a manipulative plotter?
It's fine if you all found it believable. I can agree it would be believable in another show, just not with the Ben that we have seen over the past 3 seasons.
Except that's not what he did here. If this were more like Ben, he wouldn't have been doing the cheesy dinner party trick and the look-at-the-beautiful-house-I'm-giving-you thing.
That's not how I saw it, JT. He was being cheesy and weak. Very beta male. Cooking her dinner but telling her it was a dinner party. Storming off like a little baby when after he tells Juliet that she is his.
Ben's NERD LOVE
Exactly right on this one. It was ok, but it certainly didn't match up with last week's episode.
That's a good point about EMT guy having his hand in Uncle Bleedy's chest. But the psychiatrist in last week's episode tried to drug Ellison in order to test him for terminatitis. Then he proceeded to stab him in the leg because he thought it possible that Skynet could design a robot that would fake people out by…
City Hall!
Totally forgot to mention city hall. That was so fucking awesome. We all know that the people in city hall are fucking it up for the people in the streets!
Again, pretty fun
The show had it's moments, but it was also ridiculously frustrating. In other words, par for the course.
Yeah, there are a lot of reasons to dislike Jack. He's pushy and overbearing. He's supremely confident in a bad way. And he's mean a lot of the time.
Dharma Box Wine
The Dharma Box Wine made me laugh out loud last night. So much that I missed the next couple lines of dialogue.