Same reaction. There were a lot of very funny scenes this episode.
Same reaction. There were a lot of very funny scenes this episode.
I'm getting a strong feeling that the Abies were somehow intentionally created by Pilcher. The story of how they took over has been suspiciously vague and nonsensical. Humans just evolved into these things within a couple thousand years?
Yeah now I'm super curious.
You would think I would have heard of a really famous lion, by definition.
He should have been grabbing pikes and pulling them out of the soldiers' hands. They may have broken through the line that way.
What's controversial about appropriating white music?
He once toured with this other guy…had a funky name, can't recall…
Reminds me of the article last week where the reviewer thought that Ben Stiller's appearance in The Cable Guy was a satire of the OJ trial (and not the Menendez brothers).
Right, of course! The silliest part of that is that we already know that Jon Snow is the one guy who doesn't need a shield.
Oh! I forgot another big pair of em:
Stupid things:
So many words to say something so screamingly obvious.
I don't see any relevant distinction. You went on to say that because of this gratefulness, he should clam up. So that's what I'm disagreeing with.
I don't think the quality of the show should bear on the legitimacy of his opinion, either. I mean, you wouldn't say a black guy should be grateful to be on a show and shut up about the Amos and Andy reboot. That doesn't mean I think the kid's opinions are totally fair and correct, but I think you mention a whole…
The gay characters on Modern Family are cliche (like all the other characters on MF), but I am have always felt that Stonestreet's character was especially so. It always bugged me a little more since the actor isn't really gay, so it feels a little like a pantomime. Maybe it's partly because I simply like JTF and…
What in god's name does this have to do with freedom of speech? I'm all for real FoS arguments but you dilute that when you invoke them in a situation where nobody is being restricted. Unless you think ABC should have its free speech restricted, too, and be unable to threaten Gavin with a firing.
…AMERICA!
There's nothing I like about Bollea, but none of that entitles his privacy to be violated. We can't violate someone's privacy in such an intimate way just because we don't like the way they think.
According to the Daily News article, the prosecutor claimed he had lured her back for the purpose of killing her, and originally charged him with first degree murder.
Mediocre Job, AV Club!