avclub-d0ffbcc7a0902a16ab546c810847099f--disqus
LosPollosHermanos
avclub-d0ffbcc7a0902a16ab546c810847099f--disqus

Of course—-just like almost all the people Philip and Elizabeth have killed.

YES!!! I had absolutely no feelings for the Soviet sub accident victims. It has been quite a common tactic in the spy game to feed the other side false information, with the goal of doing damage. In fact, the recent Stuxnet attack on Iranian enrichment centrifuges could be seen in this vein.

"Hola Dawson, que es el dealio?"

It would be funny to see the same mail robot working in the Soviet embassy.

I saw regret in his face. He was doing something he had to do, but still felt attached.

I refuse to fall into sympathy for the lead characters—-they are Soviet spies, and need to be shot. I find it weird that the writers try to manipulate viewers into siding with them.

Killing landowners is no guarantee their property would go up for sale—-there are heirs to consider. In fact the probate process would cause quite a delay. Boyd would understand that.

Any thoughts on the motive behind the land grab?

Maybe she was just trying to show Raylan she wasn't the nobody he took her for.

Alan has a brother, so that seems good enough reason to be specific.

Revenge of the Fungus People?

I submitted my resume to the Ilaria Corporation.

Wow, that had not occurred to me—-but it would be a good twist.

Well, that could solve the dilemma—-unless it turns out the fetus could overcome even that.

Peter's hand sign meant "run like hell" according to Alan.

She thought Alan was dead, so she was keeping the fetus as the only part of him left—maybe, that's just my guess.

She was convincingly scary in her insanity, but just as believable in her interludes of clarity—I think a realistic portrayal of schizophrenia.

That makes him all the more likeable.

Between episodes I like to spend time admiring my tablescapes.

Raylan and Boyd are two sides of the same coin—-both amoral in their own ways. I see both as good and evil.