What's the deal with Pirate Ken?
I assumed the eye patch was temporary, but no? Did I miss them telling me he lost the eye?

Look, I'm way too late to the party for anyone to be reading this, but IF you are of that special age where GI Joe and Transformers were the it things and IF you were the type who preferred GI Joe to the Transformers, and IF you ran home from school everyday to watch this show (which came on at 3:30 or 4 or…

Without a doubt, this is the worst show John B has watched in the past 5 years. And I watched all 13 episodes. F for "Fuck You, Helix"

Hey, thanks. I've had it a long time.

I'm with you. I hate feeling like I'm wondering what the combination to Kirk's safe is, but for a show that seemed so deliberately well constructed to rely on a mystical PDF of a 20 year old tax return that takes a deduction you can't take really threw me out of the show.

Post deleted by author as repetitious.

In fairness to Clone, I thought that was a really weird place to put a mirror. You could see the tv in it.

The main title montage was perfect, and I won't accept anyone's opinion to the contrary.

I loved the voice over and shot of the guy handing out thermal blankets which were the size of a handkerchief.

Note to self: this show blows.
Damn you, nonunion Mexican equivalent of Lorenzo Lamas.

I'm with you. Why the hell did Hatake contact the CDC if (1) he doesn't want them there and (2) he's going to make things as difficult as possible for them? Nothing about this show makes any sense whatsoever. Also, if I was like a plague doctor or whatever, and I was working on a plague, I think I'd try really hard…

In all seriousness, DMX could pretty much kill this guy, right? I mean when it was screech vs urkle or whatever, there was some effort to match the fighters, wasn't there?

Specifically, I believe the rules require the winners to buy the first round.

No, he is not.

Pepper steak is your entree.

Romantic horror?

I just checked Google on the hope against hope that this was actually a (gloriously awesome) thing. No dice.

I agree. Traditional Republicanism assumes either inequality is justified by freedom and just deserts or that inequality is an unfortunate by product of desired utilitarianism. Where Romney goes tone deaf is confusing what he wants to happen (corporations increase the total pie, making everyone richer) with what…

Hey, I'm no Romney apologist, and I sure as hell am not a Republican, but to be fair (if that matters at all), that's not what he was saying. What he was saying is that a corporation isn't some big nameless, faceless thing but a vehicle by which real people make their investments. So sticking it to corporations…

I like her.