avclub-bd282ef25a82fc6ff53e2b80d656deea--disqus
Patchfacethefool
avclub-bd282ef25a82fc6ff53e2b80d656deea--disqus

No, we just make boxes in which people get nailed.

To be fair, he'd have saved the Death Star for the sequels if he'd known he'd even get to make them.

Many interesting and important things have been put into boxes over the
years: textiles, other boxes…even sex!

I don't think he ever recycled an entire plot. Some bits of iconic dialogue and music sometimes, but that was more of a wink to the audience than sheer cynical, creatively bankrupt laziness.

Well, I like the Hader-Killam/Poehler-Fey era.

Lawrence Kasdan and Michael Arndt though. And the story treatment is by Lucas, who likes to take things to new places, whether or not the audience likes it.

I liked Macgruber. There, I said it.

Yeah, blue gold is something I understand too.

I hope JJ has learned his lesson about senselessly repurposing the plot of an earlier movie.

There's only one AVC Q&A to be made right now: is the dress blue-black or white-gold??

Seriously, how bullshitty is this?

This is a Buzzfeed-level bullshit question.

But then again, who does?

I fucking love that part of the book. If they adapt that, I will be extremely pleased.

Dude, don't even joke about that.
*shudders

No. The book explores a different theme using the same premise.

Nope. Will check it out.

Isn't Deckard definitively a Replicant? The cut with the unicorn dream is the final, director's cut right?

I like the endings of his short stories and I think Do Androids Dream is the exception to that rule. I love that ending actually.

Is Vangelis on board? 'Cus then I am.