I would also be curious, considering his condition, if Ebert has seen any of these movies in Imax 3D or only a home 3d system. It's not the same at all.
I would also be curious, considering his condition, if Ebert has seen any of these movies in Imax 3D or only a home 3d system. It's not the same at all.
The scenes from far away where I could see the crowd in front and that band just sticking out of it were incredible. This was the film that showed me 3D could be art and not just a marketing ploy.
I actually thought it was a good concert also. Anyway, I agree. I have been telling everyone about this movie for a year. In 3d IMAX, it was better than most actual concerts I have been to. It was a real breakthrough of a film.
How many of these have you seen in 3D on a huge screen? I always thought it was a gimmick also, U23D was the first I saw (3D imax) that changed my mind. It was incredibly immersive. Coraline also really showed what the format can do when it is conceived that way from the beginning. It was like looking at a little…
Yep. The last two episodes have made me give up even discussing grading. Who cares? It these two eps are not "A's," then I have no idea what could be. The whole grading thing is just silly.
Which is exactly why he SHOULDN"T have said it.
Exactly how I feel. Superior acting and set directions, the occasional great moment (opening the door to the cut throat with the KKK guys behind it, the two speeches and the opening song tonight) undercut by obvious symbolism. I really enjoy it, but something about it keeps it distant from me. I don't feel a…
Mol is 39. If she had him when she was 14, he could be 25, which is about right. I think they are purposely making it look jarring to our modern sensibilities.
The cut in the speeches was one of the best things they have done in the show. Confusing for just the right amount of time ….
Good thought
Not just college, but Moorehouse (all male, historically black), which was a nice touch.
I hated that line. I like the emotion in it and it was well acted, but what the fuck is Jimmy supposed to say or do? There is no good response, which - I imagine - is why they cut away after it. It was too on-the-nose for me.
The look on her face when she was watching him was a perfect little moment. That's why I watch this show in spite of the heavy-handedness.
Nothing on the show shows how truly different (some) people were back then that couple. Rose is my grandmother. When she was alive, mentioning sex would have been unthinkable and any conversation with her was like taking to an alien.
I found it unsettling, in a good way. I thought that having him ask Jimmy what it felt like "to have it all" was to "muddy footprinty." There is a reason they cut away immediately after that. How does Jimmy react? Beat the hell out of him? Let him cry in his lap? There is just no response to that. But, the gluing…
@avclub-a43012a332fc066e7ecf57a9b678fb51:disqus (below - stupid five string limit) Does Zuckerburg NEED another pick-up line?
Someone on the thread suggested that Rose had him locked in a basement and pushed some homeless guy in front of a train.
Stipulated
I'm calling it right now. Largest one week drop off in history next monday.
Seriously, I accept that sitcom characters are always going to live in apartments that they could never, ever afford with their jobs in real life. But, are we supposed to think that people don't know that Williamsburg is probably the most desirable neighborhood in America for a young person?