It did have color in it. That's about all I'll give you out of those. Especially Arnold not being Bane.

I think Guy Pearce is great. I was looking forward to this film. It was unbearable. Quippy, sarcastic anti-heroes work on occasion, but not when every single line they have is a quip. The part where he was with the rescued girl and she was feeding him straight lines for jokes, I started rooting for the bad guys.

Dude, you're the one literally arguing that it is funny to say offensive things to people because you share the viewpoint of a child. It's kind of strange to be going after me for MY life experience.

So is this show made by little kids? Because the whole thing was offensive and much of it coming from the 'unbiased' view of the camera as opposed to a character who may have faults. Which may be forgiven if it was funny or entertaining

ITS THE LEAST THEY CAN DO!!!!1!!!

I'm arguing pretty much that economic distinctions don't mask how wrong the conduct is. Is it theft? Who gives a shit? It's still wrong. And whether or not you can prove foregone profit is a loss, anyone that isn't deluding themselves know that it is a factor. A non-quantifiable factor? Sure. But that doesn't…

Good point. And if I sneak into a movie theater to see a movie for free they cannot prove I would paid to see that same movie and therefore nobody loses anything ever!

This was a response to the wrong person. Sorry.

I disagree. I think they focused on Byers because he acted weird. He was a convenient villain for the narrative they had and then they proceeded to try to pin it on him in the minds of the public based on an extremely weak circumstantial case. Yes, Byers was an attention-seeking weirdo with a dodgy past. So was…

I can't give anything with an ending as bad as the World's End a review even close to a Coen brothers film. That was tacked on from another film. And Fargo (or Inside Llewyn Davis), a melancholy film with a lot of dark comedy compared to Shaun of the Dead…a film that can't decide if it wants to be a cartoon or if it…

Dear God, no. Wes Anderson and the Coens make movies that feel like cohesive whole projects. Like they understand the concept of having a tone.

That Batmobile scene is abysmal. Drags the movie down a letter grade by itself in my opinion. My friends and I pin that on Goyer, perhaps unfairly, because he also is abysmal.

Marvel: Can we have a consistent tone and a decent ending?

I wonder sometimes if those smug 'activists' who berated and blamed Byers outside the courtroom ever felt bad about basically taunting a guy whose kid was murdered because he was kind of a jerk. But I know the answer is 'no'.

Part Two is an embarrassment and I'm kind of surprised the films are held in such high regard due to its existence. They literally blamed the wrong guy because it made good TV and he was kind of crazy.

I think he meant the Day the Earth Stood Still. But he's an idiot.

Good thing he's not a writer!

I also wish for sports to become chemistry meets.

She did it to everyone. She leaked information extremely damaging to the campaign for personal interest only. I am now rooting for her to lose an arm and her best friend to be killed by bees.

God, I want this show to grip me again, but I'm losing it. I don't really care for Pitt's obvious Ledger-Joker imitation. I think this whole Will fakes Freddie's death was entirely too predictable to be given so much episode time trying to lead us astray. And the show is really going to have to explain the whole…