I never saw it, just because I figured it wasn't any good. It's not like the world chases anyone around with it and suggests they watch it. It's not the sort of movie you see playing in a lobby somewhere. I don't know whether it's missable in the critic's sense, but it's surely missable in the literal sense.

I liked this article a lot better than the last one I read by the writer. But the headline is truth as banality.

Looks like it may have wrestled free of your grasp too there pal

It seems a lot more likely that people would stop watching a show after a resolution occurred, but also less interesting as a question.

I stopped watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer when Sarah Michelle Gellar's growth as an actress drowned off-screen.

I have to admit that the choice to cast McKinnon in that role is the only thing really drawing me to this movie in any way at all. I'm curious.

And for the foreign markets that are more important than ever nowadays, and, finally, for me . . . the Mickster.

I already feel like Waltz is overused.

You would obviously be forced to take political correctness classes by the politically correct sheeple. Things have been going downhill since you no longer needed to turn an old-timey crank on the side of the ENIAC-sized computer to get it to work.

Yeah when you put swears and sex and so on in stuff it is then full of those things

A Nice TryFC Midnight

I accidentally saw Kubrick's The Shining as a young kid, younger than the kids you describe. I don't really regret it.

This one is a lot more Argento than Barker to me. But I guess trailers suggest style more than anything, and, well.

Has that gotten a "Watch This"? It should.

I suppose it's superfluous to mention that "Die Hard" is, in a way, a series of official knock-offs, but that's why we have comments.

It's no Worst Witch.

You are not a Claudia.

it almost seems like the film’s trying out an unusually provocative metaphor, letting a libertine babysitter represent the hormonal overload of adolescence.

I'm going to ask a serious question, in the sense that I don't know the answer: does this site tend to deliver effusive praise to its recent interview subjects in its headlines more often than not? And in any case, is that still considered in poor taste by anyone?

It's my chiptune trance DJ act from a couple years ago