avclub-ade723a6815e7dffd777dfb9719c8ad3--disqus
Unregistered Hal
avclub-ade723a6815e7dffd777dfb9719c8ad3--disqus

The shark is a Traveller who used to win bare-knuckled boxing competitions all up and down County Cork.

Pretty good

> But Statham also has a shared past with the megalodon

Apologizing for billionaires who are caught on tape bragging to near-strangers about grabbing non-consenting women by the genitals…how the fuck did we get to this point?

Oh, these movies almost always make for great trailers. There's very little chance I'll see this, but I love the trailers: gorgeous special effects; scenery-chewing acting from great, slumming actors; swashbuckling; pretty ladies in corsets; wacky Johnny Depp in just the right dose. The movie itself may fall anywhere

Fact: a thousand monkeys pounding on a thousand typewriters for a thousand years would never come up with a name as singular Gugu Mbatha-Raw.

I will never be able to unsee it.

They will also stick around because they taste good. They're certainly not the only beer I drink, but a good IPA is very good indeed.

It's weird. Reading this article, it's almost like people are talking about something that mattered in any way at all. Like, as though someone's life hung in the balance, or…maybe a cherished pet or…a couple of hundred bucks?

I'm not conflating anything with anything. You're trying to replace the system as it actually exists with some fantasy system that doesn't exist, and yelling at everyone because they aren't working within your fantasy system. I don't understand at all why going for a much larger payout in the form of a class-action

That said, even she is having trouble making the line "I took nature and science and I synthesized," sound any less dumb. This was co-written by Jon Ronson, though, and I like Jon Ronson.

I don't at all understand what you are upset about. The language of the suit is standard lawyerly bullshit. The mechanism for addressing this issue is the courts. What in fuck's name are the police going to do?

No, this is utterly wrong. This isn't a frivolous lawsuit. The only fact that matters is whether he texted STOP and whether they continued to text him after the fact. The law is incredibly clear on this point, and unless you look forward to a world in which your phone is choked with SMS spam, people absolutely should

If only there were some word for when two people are speaking. Bi-talking? Duo-lingual? Ah, forget it…

I think you're more or less right about their being a language of their own. When you combine deep irony with deep referentiality, you end up with stuff that becomes very hard for people who aren't following the conversation to parse. In the end there's probably less here than meets the eye, to be honest. Do you ever

Man, what a lame response. I'm not arguing with you, I'm shaming you. You came in here whining about hyperbole, and now you're jabbering about your nephews being chemically castrated. You led off with condescending claims about what "everyone missed" about Trump's comments — everyone presumably but you — and instead

This is such tedious horseshit. This isn't ambiguous. Trump described himself shoving his hand into a woman's crotch without warning. Women don't come forward because there is absolutely nothing to be gained — they're already humiliated, and they'll just be attacked by hateful scum like yourself if they try to press

Saw it last night. Super entertaining.

Absolutely no one missed the "they let you get away with it" part of what he said. Most of us understood it, correctly, as the delusional rationalization of a serial groper. This isn't even conjecture — there are plenty of public accounts of Trump forcing himself on women who had to physically fend him off.

It's the traditional British steamed fruit sponge pudding, so it's more like the equivalent of 1,000 children's nightmares…