Knowing that it'd be a little more meta/inside-basebally than the usual CBB, I actually enjoyed this episode a little more than the first. Neither of them compares to PFT at his best, though, and I'm still a little aggravated that the original was voted best episode of the year with all the actual good improv to…

Well they both know a thing or two about getting rid of excess baggage…

Well they both know a thing or two about getting rid of excess baggage…

"…and they cover it with soap, and you're supposed to THANK them, like they're doing YOU a favor!"

"…and they cover it with soap, and you're supposed to THANK them, like they're doing YOU a favor!"

Is the Enterprise:Miami-E big enough for Mark Harmon and David Caruso AND Paget Brewster?

"This is the fourth Scrambler death in the last 3 months…Gotta be the work of the Scrambler Tamperer. I'll have metro put out a BOLO for a…HomeService Plus van, I guess."

Mark Harmon as an investigative chef with Asperger's?

Don't Trust the Community in Apartment Number Shit My Dad Says: Los Angeles

Don't Trust the Community in Apartment Number Shit My Dad Says: Los Angeles

Mine was modest in size, definitely underground, and contained only the essentials: giant TV with all the coolest new systems like Neo Geo and Turbografx 16, fridge, couch, and pool.

Mine was modest in size, definitely underground, and contained only the essentials: giant TV with all the coolest new systems like Neo Geo and Turbografx 16, fridge, couch, and pool.

It does bring to mind the question: If you're going to go out of your way to create a superhero with NO superpowers - just a lot of money and cool shit - shouldn't you AT LEAST get the science right?

It does bring to mind the question: If you're going to go out of your way to create a superhero with NO superpowers - just a lot of money and cool shit - shouldn't you AT LEAST get the science right?

…which, in a nutshell, is the problem with how this movie is perceived. Is it REALLY beyond reproach? Is it really worth THAT level of voracity in arguing about it? I liked it, while simultaneously finding it incredibly fucking silly, and I caught ENDLESS shit from my friends for sharing that opinion.

…which, in a nutshell, is the problem with how this movie is perceived. Is it REALLY beyond reproach? Is it really worth THAT level of voracity in arguing about it? I liked it, while simultaneously finding it incredibly fucking silly, and I caught ENDLESS shit from my friends for sharing that opinion.

*throws whiskey drink at Punk Wok*

*throws whiskey drink at Punk Wok*

So how does a victorious slave-owning agrarian confederacy sustain itself? It doesn't, under any circumstance. Not for even 5 years. Even IF you accept the ridiculous Lost-Causer notion that slavery would have inevitably and peacefully found its conclusion, and they would've somehow industrialized overnight.

So how does a victorious slave-owning agrarian confederacy sustain itself? It doesn't, under any circumstance. Not for even 5 years. Even IF you accept the ridiculous Lost-Causer notion that slavery would have inevitably and peacefully found its conclusion, and they would've somehow industrialized overnight.