avclub-a14c2ff4ad3fc72f55d66186c2abc04e--disqus
The Crawling Chaos
avclub-a14c2ff4ad3fc72f55d66186c2abc04e--disqus

Apropos nothing much
Piers Morgan is a fucking cunt.

I had a great idea for a movie about a Rubik's cube that was possessed by evil forces, so that if you ever solve it, demons come out and kill you.

Drew Barrymore is fairly hot, but gets extra hotness points for being bisexual and insane.

Apparently Murphy has only made two live action movies since Norbit, and literally nobody went to see either one of them. Until Big Momma's House 3 comes out and makes $10000000000, it almost looks as though the movie-going public has some taste.

@ El Zilcho: Damon's last four movies (The Hereafter, Green Zone, Invictus and The Informant!) have all basically tanked. He's a good actor, unlike plenty on this list, but he isn't making anyone in Hollywood any money at the moment.

Are they going to keep doing this origin story once a decade or so? Because that would be shit.

11) Ensure that Johnny Depp has lots of opportunities for overacting. If that clip was any guide, we're on safe ground with this one.

Put me down for some Sleepy Hollow love, too. As for Planet of the Apes, it isn't a BAD movie, exactly, just a completely pointless one.

I do not know this Captain Caveman of whom you speak, Do you, perchance, mean Captain CAAAAAVEMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN?

Actual headline from BBC news this week: Why Is Keith Richards Still Alive?

Psychomania
Fuck yeah. Best zombie bikers make a pact with Satan movie you will ever see. And it's got Beryl Reid as a freaky old witch lady!

You could always annoy Leonardo DiCaprio by buying a copy of Don's Plum, which he also tried to get banned. But like Brody, DiCaprio seems like a pretty decent guy.

I have to say, I'm a bit confused here. I was under the impression that a movie had to be pretty terrible to qualify for CTOTD. Have the criteria just changed, or has this feature always been open to good movies (and yeah, fuck it, this is a good, stupid movie) if they lost money? Can we expect to see the likes of

Ah c'mon Shitgeist, tell me you're not disappointed. Only half a dozen people responding to your obvious trolling, and you had to respond three times to your own comment to get even that much.

Well, this looks like a great movie!
A talented director, a financier who knows all about the movie business, and a subject that hasn't already failed disastrously. Twice. All done in the style of a movie that hasn't become tediously over-copied since it came out. Now all we need is the perfect star to play

Ridley Scott makes two kinds of films - great, and so boring you want to claw your eyes out rather than watch any more of it. 1492 is definitely in the latter category, and may be the single most boring thing created by the human race.

They also got Billie Piper to play Smaug. There's a surprising amount of unresolved sexual tension between their characters.

I just watched Citizen Kane, and it was some boring shit about some guy trying to run a newspaper.

@ Sugartits - There were some good parts, and I completely agree about Texas, which had a completely different feel to the rest of the South, and looked a hell of a lot prettier. Aside from that, and bits of Arkansas forest, the landscape was really surprisingly ugly to a guy who had been brought up on movies, which

America! It's not like in the movies!
As a non-American, having seen approximately 100000000 TV programmes and movies about the place before I actually went there, I was sure America was about 90% desert and Monument Valley, and the rest was equally divided between cute little small towns full of lovely small-town