Terrible.
There was NOTHING good or interesting about this episode. The action was terrible… Not just spotty, but TERRIBLE.

My favorite part…
…was when the Oprah-looking psychiatrist got the rundown of Benford's vision. They switch to the same, tired flashforward we've been seeing all season—to which she responds, "Well, that doesn't sound like two minutes and seventeen seconds."

well, bungle, that explanation actually makes sense to me. edgar was certainly not a red shirt… it seems that people here just aren't quite sure what a red shirt is…

obviously you still have NO IDEA what a "red shirt" is… very sad

"pro red shirt agenda"

Dammit… One more thing to the guy who called him "this season's Edgar." That is the stupidest comment I've heard yet. Who on 24 is SAFE from being killed off? There have been countless characters that were introduced and killed within the course of one season. There would have to be several "Edgars" per season.

By the way, you people need to learn the definition of a red shirt. A red shirt does not typically get named as a major guest character, nor are they given a name and any sort of story.

Great review, but…
…do you not ever watch movies? TV?

Addendum…
I forgot to mention that Michael and the gang are only allowed to shoot people in season finales. Ugh. He's like MacGyver, with his morality, but without the awesome haircut.

Okay, really? Now we complain?
Yeah, either last season—erm, or the first part of this season maybe (who can keep track with mid-season finales and stuff…), I mentioned how this show just wasn't very good anymore.

Agreed, Deputy. Hiding that nonsense is a classic gag pulled by way too many sitcoms. Boring.

Aside from this not being a "post-apocalyptic" show—
—I agree with pretty much everything else the reviewer mentioned. What a mess… Damn it.

If I were truly "speechless" I wouldn't have replied, douche.

Nice rebuttal. Whatever.

Um… What are you talking about? Jesus, now you're just resorting to pure nonsensical bullshit. So, lemme get this straight. You can't win an argument. You (apparently) don't get sarcasm. You can't figure out why a bull GORES and a drill BORES… So now you're going to say you "made slomo cry"? Okay, first of…

ONCE AGAIN YOU DO NOT GET THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PAY NETWORKS AND CABLE NETWORKS. Are you stupid? HBO and USA don't play by the same rules BECAUSE one is a PAY NETWORK and another is a CABLE NETWORK. Therefore, your logic holds NO WATER. Apples and oranges.

Up a post replace "things" with "thinks." Damn you index finger.

PS—Lemme crack another egg o' knowledge over your head here. If a PAY CHANNEL gets as many viewers as CABLE that is quite an accomplishment. You know, 'cause one is virtually free with service, while the other is an added monthly fee. Just in case you couldn't quite grasp that bit of logic on your own. Jackass.

Yes, Nomo, I come on here and TEAR my hair out of my head because I must CONSTANTLY justify myself… What? First of all, I'm not "justifying myself." I'm arguing with people whose opinions I find ridiculous. Whether or not people agree with me is inconsequential. If I didn't find this entertaining I wouldn't be…

Okay, I admit, that was a bit harsh… But, man, you suck at this. You should just quit… I almost feel sorry for you now.