avclub-664604d70bd60f1f888ec66fe5f9c583--disqus
fawlty
avclub-664604d70bd60f1f888ec66fe5f9c583--disqus

"Huh? I just swipe my phone to pay." they say, oblivious that their parents credit card gets charged.

GOALS!

I'm waiting until they're on Twitch.

It should've been a trilogy!

A much better summary of the ludicrous plot from the first one:

I enjoyed it, but realized halfway through that I wasn't getting the intricate movie I hoped for, but I enjoyed it anyway even though it was stupid.

Not really. The tricks are pretty much impossible without it though.

But was it bad? The majority of AV Club voters liked it.

They get biz-ay! Consistently and thoroughly.

You can find thousands of them at the nearest Trump rally.

It was also well received by the audience, it has has 7.3/10 on IMDb and about the same on the AV Club user grade.

" then the ending came and I shut it off"

I think they stopped pretending that halfway through the first one as well.

IGN gave it a positive review.

I'm seeing it tomorrow and am fairly excited about it. The positive
reviews on RT are few (23% right now) but they almost seem to describe
the movie wholly differently than the bad ones do.

Agreed with all that. The movie was still a snorefest though. I struggled to make it through. Poorly paced and directed, because the premise and the script weren't that bad.

That sounds like an opening sequence voiceover.

This movie has been in development forever, and was originally based on the first Warcraft game, but I'm pretty sure they moved to incorporate WOW elements as well once that game became popular.

"Flaked" is possibly my favorite show this year. I thought it was fantastic and loved how it progressed all the way until the end ("all the way" being generous since it's only 8 episodes).

Is it good or bad for TV when content producers find out that what we actually watch is much more mundane than what we claim to watch?