Good story. Still doubt QT would kill the momentum of his climax to include that scene, though.

No, not his mouth!

Bob's Burgers: Randy, Mickey, Marshmellow, Andie and Ollie, DRL, Gayle, Dr. Yap…

There's still a whole lot of supposition on your part here. That story talks about Rosario having trouble with the scene where she leaves the Winstead character behind at the guy's house. At no point in the story is it said that a rape scene was actually shot and intended for the film.

I thought about that, but Hipster has made it quite clear over the course of years of posting that he is not one for vulnerability, tenderness or (often) even basic decency.

"which I'm 100% sure the creators decided to do just for the sake of being outrageous.

It's easy to extrapolate, from your idiotic interpretation of what you said happened to you, that if you don't think it was rape then it wouldn't be rape if it happened to someone else. Basically, because you're oblivious and obtuse, a whole bunch of survivors' experiences don't count.

Okay you're now militantly refusing to comment on the topic at hand. At what point did you decide to not be a serious person?

We are really having it. You should try to join in if you're capable.

Do you have evidence for this claim?

Amazingly awful and oblivious comment from Hipster there. Yea if you didn't want to have sex you were raped. Do you not even know what you want?

Which means there was no half-rape. Because that doesn't exist.

Yes, Cliffy, you're viewing the scene incorrectly. You are wrong.

It's difficult to grasp for many, I believe, because they just don't want to imagine something so terrible could happen and does happen. There has to be a rationalizing factor that makes it a little less bad, that gives a bit of a buffer between you and the the horror.

Beema really wants to just get all those annoying voices that don't share the fandom out of here.

Also they turned it into a straight rape scene in a rather transparent effort to make things more "dark" and "serious." They reduced what might be a complex bit of emotional manipulation in the books into a depiction of immoral brute force because they thought it would be more titillating.

So your argument is basically "Well, cut them some slack: they're not good at their jobs!" Awesome argument.

Hahaha that is pretty hysterical.

Naw, you both are missing the point of this particular controversy.

You're right. Fiction can have no bearing or connection to the real world. Especially not fictitious shows watched and talked about by millions of people. The media we produce has absolutely nothing to do with our social constructs. You're a genius.