You need to research the other article to understand why you're way off base here. For one, the systematic undertaking and rationalization of male castration isn't really a major issue in the first world.

That argument popped up a lot yesterday, was dealt with and quashed there. Get with the times.

That was the best part. Exactly what Stuntman Mike really was: a pathetic coward. One of the best treatments of psychos I've seen.

I doubt that.

The plot hole her character disappeared into was one of the most sly grindhouse send-ups in the entire piece.

Clearly a lot of people did. Which is good, because it's awesome.

Yeah I think so too. Tristana by Luis Bunuel is one I caught on streaming recently.

I personally like how there are two errors of spelling/grammar in the first three words of his screed.

Basically the personality and mental state behind your obsessive posting and strident argumentation. These are the works of a mind wracked with barely-concealed social, sexual and political panic and paranoia.

Oh, ya think?

It should because that's an awesome scene.

But it played like a great one, which I think is more important.

It would require them to totally misread the scene in the book though.

He's clearly a very emotionally mature person.

You really don't understand what you're talking about at all, do you? I'm very concerned about you for a number of reasons now.

Bless their hearts, they didn't get the point of the article at all.

I'm very worried about people who are so aggressive in defending things like this. I wonder why it's so important to them to die on the cross insisting a rape culture doesn't exist.

I thought War Horse was great. Don't understand the commentariat's loathing.

I think Catch Me If You Can is a better movie than Jurassic Park.

It'd probably be a bit better than that.