So you think there are "rules" in an AV Club comments section?

You think it's impossible that famous recording artists could be unaware of the different readings different people can take from their pop confections? The age of innocence has not left us.

"but in the show, they didn't want to confuse the viewers…"

"like I am doing this very moment."

It kinda is. The aspect that is troubling about that song is that the performers/writers seem oblivious to it.

"The only purpose for making this an outright rape scene is that the show runners know that shock value equals good ratings."

Haha "there are rules here."

As they pointed out in the article, compressing for characterization is one thing. These examples are changing the entire dynamic of sequences while leaving little else "compressed." I think the difference between the two should be obvious.

He's pretty good in that movie. You've met tons of guys just like him all through your life.

He was good in that.

The truth is that it's a good movie with Gordon's cardboard line readings being the only duff note.

Kim Gordon is also in "I'm Not There."

Nice summation. I think von Trier intended to say something nuanced with Dogville, but the message that really comes out is "America is bad now." And he basically wastes a once-in-a-lifetime cast.

Gold in that butt. Ayayayayah

Yeah Dogville doesn't really know what it's going for. Oof.

My legal knowledge doesn't stretch that far.

"daughter-in-law."

Disagree.

I think I agree.

You don't understand what actually happened…