They had Thomas Roberts in Russia and didn't even make one joke about Russia's anti-gay laws? Lame.

Wow, what?

Kerry Washington was a fantastic host. I've never seen Scandal and only had a vague idea of who she was, but I think she could easily be a semi-regular, along the lines of Alec Baldwin and Timberlake.

Um, why would people cringe? How can you even make a comment like that without seeing the performance first?

Not only pointless, but smug and self-satisfied.

It won't happen, but he'll definitely be nominated, and he deserves it. The performance is astonishing, especially given that I've never been particularly impressed with him in the past.

No, because that's dumb. Given that transsexuals make up a tiny sliver of the population and transsexual actors make up a tiny sliver of that, it stands to reason that there probably aren't any transsexuals able to do the role as well as Jared Leto. Alexis Arquette is too old. Comparing that to "black face" is asinine.

Definitely agree.

A drug-addict dying of AIDS with a six-pack would have affected the performance, yes and would've made the portrayal ring false.

Both Matthew and Jared Leto's performances were excellent, so…no.

At the ending title cards, it says that AZT is still used in cocktails today at lower, safer levels.

Do you think you're on a different website? Silly partisan nonsense isn't really AVclub's thing, especially when it's completely off topic.

Given that he didn't mention what will happen during the climax of the film, I don't know what you're on about.

Given that he didn't mention what will happen during the climax of the film, I don't know what you're on about.

People as spoiler-phobic as you should probably avoid reading anything about a movie or TV show before you watch it.

People as spoiler-phobic as you should probably avoid reading anything about a movie or TV show before you watch it.

People as spoiler-phobic as you should probably avoid reading anything about a movie or TV show before you watch it.

Wouldn't that depend on whose making the excuse? I'm sure in Germany people said, "sure Hitler's killing millions of Jews, but he's just trying to keep us safe from their wily ways".

I'm not just talking about right here. No one in the entirety of the internet is floating your theory, because it's totally wrong. It's not that "we'll see". We already saw Carol admitting to killing two people. At this point I have a strong suspicion you'll continue to say it's ambiguous no matter how many times…

It isn't eating your posts. If you click on my comment up top it won't show the latest comment that you made in response to my comment. I don't know why.
Carol killing two walkers and letting the entire camp falsely think a double homicide took place is in no way "interesting". It's an action without a motive. It's…