avclub-5fdbaa11bd42c308322756f60f43785f--disqus
The UMD
avclub-5fdbaa11bd42c308322756f60f43785f--disqus

That was like a callback to classic Dexter - him eating that delicious-looking sandwich.  God those things are amazing. 

I've enjoyed multiple viewings of this movie a lot.  It holds up.  Also, I still think of it as the very best of that rash of "what a twist!" movies we had for half a decade or so - he out Shyamalan'd Shyamalan, and out-Verbal'd Keyser Soze.  What's so great about that last twist is how devastating it is on a

I've enjoyed multiple viewings of this movie a lot.  It holds up.  Also, I still think of it as the very best of that rash of "what a twist!" movies we had for half a decade or so - he out Shyamalan'd Shyamalan, and out-Verbal'd Keyser Soze.  What's so great about that last twist is how devastating it is on a

He was haunted to the point that he immediately rewatched something he had just seen.  That's unusual for most people.

He was haunted to the point that he immediately rewatched something he had just seen.  That's unusual for most people.

Ghostbusters 3 would (or will) be a piece of shit.  Why do you want anyone to enable that?

Ghostbusters 3 would (or will) be a piece of shit.  Why do you want anyone to enable that?

Aykroyd?  What are you doing here?

Aykroyd?  What are you doing here?

That was pretty much my reaction, too.

That was pretty much my reaction, too.

I thought that might have been the best "Castle" ever.  Satisfyingly light and silly, both the leads having a lot of fun, a very funny (and hammy) guest star, and a complete willingness to discard believable procedural touchstones like motive and plausible method of murder in favor of just having a good time.  Really

I thought that might have been the best "Castle" ever.  Satisfyingly light and silly, both the leads having a lot of fun, a very funny (and hammy) guest star, and a complete willingness to discard believable procedural touchstones like motive and plausible method of murder in favor of just having a good time.  Really

"Are you gonna dismember that dead body, stuff it into trash bags, and dump it into the gulf stream?" - Dexter

"Are you gonna dismember that dead body, stuff it into trash bags, and dump it into the gulf stream?" - Dexter

I'll tell you what you did there, Caligula.  You combined murderin' and sex into one disgusting urge.

I'll tell you what you did there, Caligula.  You combined murderin' and sex into one disgusting urge.

Why should I care if the terms are "lazy"?  If they're useful, in that they communicate something true about the thing they describe - even if the intent of the description is simple mockery/derision - then I really don't give a shit about laziness.  This isn't creative writing class, it's talking about things that

Why should I care if the terms are "lazy"?  If they're useful, in that they communicate something true about the thing they describe - even if the intent of the description is simple mockery/derision - then I really don't give a shit about laziness.  This isn't creative writing class, it's talking about things that

Things that deserve reduction and derision frequently get it.  I'm not saying all movies labeled "torture porn" or "chick flicks" (or "buttrock") deserve it, but many do, and that's why the labels exist and what their utility is.