The kind of people who use words like "good for its time" are also the kind of people who call special effects "graphics". These people do not see beyond how realistic the effects are. This is the end all to their film watching.

Well, at least a brown guy is saying "bitches be trippin'."

My Superman is not a deadbeat dad or a Peeping Tom. But Brandon Routh was perfectly cast. It's the only thing right about that movie.

Exactly. People who act all sad for a guy they never met who lived a great life are weird.

Also according to this article that you can read by simply scrolling up.

And no story stands alone. The audience brings their own experiences. There is a storytelling shorthand that less experienced will miss. This is why when you see a film years apart it seems so different. It isn't.  You are.

Made-for-TV cartoons used to really suck.

Was this recorded on a Pixelvision camera?

You don't use champagne glasses for anything but champagne. They're shaped like that on purpose.

Or have your weak opinion. Either way.

That's a piece of information you'd think would be in the column itself.

Now go see Apocalypse Now and then see Up again.

Who knows. Poor writing. Why bring it up at all with nothing to back your opinion anyway?

Every time a new Pixar movie comes out, someone declares their trend of good films to be over.

How are you viewing these? Digital download? Touchpad? Which app?

Picture: Oswalt on the set of the worst Blade movie.

You know what isn't criticism? Recapping the plot.

Squeal. Patton Oswalt.

I hear George Lucas did revisions on some of his films and taking that information and applying it to his comments can be funny.

I think I got the joke pretty early on. I don't need to read it more.