avclub-4dea77b4de0de07675db185e1e6ec52b--disqus
QuicklyThoughtUpUserID
avclub-4dea77b4de0de07675db185e1e6ec52b--disqus

The synergy between X-Men Blob and The Blob Blob can increase metrics among the 15-22 demographic by 16.4%.

I literally cringed when reading that quote. Probably because I knew the exact behind-the-scenes promotional video cadence used complete with the exaggerated hand movements. But also because of what he said as much as how I imagined him saying it. Or the PR person typing it imagined him saying it.

Blandy Warhol?

SHRIMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Like I said, I was imagining something far worse.

I had no idea that 50 Shades had an "infamous tampon scene" until I saw a bunch of movie sites say that the movie left out the "infamous tampon scene." And seeing what the ITS is, I was expecting something far worse.

Netflixarus?

Pleasantly reminded, hopefully.

After Locke and Peaky Blinders (as well as Eastern Promises), I'm definitely interested following Knight.

I found his performance in Tusk to be startlingly unfunny, repetitive, and missing the mark constantly. It was as if Kevin Smith was so enamored being in the presence of Johnny Depp that he couldn't constrain either of their worst impulses.

No. I meant that Steve Martin pissed on Peter Sellers' grave first.

I thought his performance as the Mad Hatter was one of the worst things I've ever seen (though to be fair, Alice in Wonderland was one of the worst movies I've ever seen, and not in the hyperbolic internet way, but in a legitimate, how did they get everything wrong and have this much money only to be so terrible, way).

Steve Martin did it first. But who will do it better? Or worse? Or should we just hope TCM shows A Shot in the Dark sometime soon?

Well I'm sickened by actors who exploit their fame to make horrible movies.

I wouldn't even mind if there were a couple of episodes without a supernatural bent (or maybe one only in the background). They kind of brought this up when they came back from break with Ichabod desperately seeking clues of evil beings, but if they took a breather for an episode or two, it might have been a welcome

I'd argue that Henry Parrish had more of a Crowley potential because at least Noble can bring that fun love-to-hate slimy quality while Abraham is more a moody and mooning lackey. But still, the show hasn't utilized either to their full potential. Though I think Henry still has that possibility- he's "killed" Moloch

Yeah but their hopes to fix it were to make it more episodic and less serialized claiming that was Season 1's success. Through ironically, I found Season 1 to be more serialized because it felt like every episode pushed forward the plot or the character relationships whereas Season 2 was just about finding the random

That was the one. He came across as someone who considers himself a true "Artiste" who does genuinely socially relevant and important work. I didn't know the Sarah Lawrence story but I wouldn't be surprised if he tried to defend himself as just a guy trying to capture life as it happens and the two women failed to

I've never seen Catfish, but I heard one of its directors/creators on Topics with Michael Ian Black and Michael Showalters (two comedians who discuss serious topics seriously, but if something funny happens, that's okay).

Grease 2 was originally inspired by the bowling alley scene in the 1932 Scarface.