I haven't watched the video yet, but I hope you mean Francisco. At least he had an ethos.

Now that I know what you mean, I'm glad I've never seen that movie.

I'm a huge fan of Paris, Texas but I've never seen this movie. I have, however, listened to the soundtrack I got from somewhere many, many times. In fact, any time I see the movie's title, I read it Nick Cave's quasi-crooner voice.

Green ones are always filled with booze.

Now REC was a great found footage horror flick, and the remake felt truly unnecessary. I think I saw a sequel to REC, but I have no memory of it. Must have been not as good.

Does the city cryo-sleep at night?

Is it bad that I have no memory of any dog in that movie?

Yep. The cult segment is great as well.

I was being facetious for the most part, but that seems to actually take away from the mystique of the first movie and its ending. Was the movie any good?

Good points, I've always thought the technique is used mostly to cover up for shoddy filmmaking. But the main reason I am unable to get engaged in most of these movies is that I'm always thinking if the reason for recording makes sense, and it very rarely does. V/H/S 2 had a great GoPro segment that pulled it off. Not…

Two-Stache.

I wanted to watch The Blair Witch. The critical reception was disappointing, but actually seeing the trailer made me give up on it completely.

He's so fat, I wanted to make an anti-joke about how he has health issues because of it, but I felt bad about it.

Not sure why you'd think that I'm a Tyson fan, or that I was engaged in a debate with you about your claims (is there a fallacy for assuming something like that?), but I am sorry you feel attacked. My response was similar to any other time I see a new commenter who seems to show an unhealthy fixation with something…

I'm not a huge fan of TheGrass or anything, and the "I fucking love science" crowd's obsession with him is tedious, but there sure seems to be a lot of passionate hatred for him on this article. Do we really have so many disillusioned scientists commenting here?

Not to mention he's killed your dog. Why else would you write 500+ similar comments across various websites (in addition to having a blog about it) in an effort to expose him?

I share the exact same opinion on the immutability/inevitability of past events. As for slight alteration causing massive repercussions, Ray Bradbury had an anthology TV show a long time ago, and one of the episodes was an adaption of his short story "A Sound of Thunder". Seeing the image at the end, of a butterfly…

I first read that as Hitler-y and thought, ooh, edgy.

A great concept from Felix J. Palma's The Map of Time had the world's government going back in time before the existence of man to store the records about important events, and "timecops" are set in place to preserve the timeline and fix things any time an illegal alteration is made.

That is surprising!