Oh, my word!  Are we back to the crunch?

This is an outrage!

You raaaaaaang, sir?

Looks like my other response was lost; forgive me is this is a double post:

Depardieu must have been her acting coach.

Arlis.

Jesus Krist!

Hand to neck…
Is this Jihadist sure that he wasn't just doing his classic "let some steam out from under the shirt collar" move?

I pity the foo.

New Franchise about the Disenfranchised?
Hopefully this film can kick-start a series of movies about the sisters of significant historical figures, who themselves went on to have not so interesting lives.

Even the early digital cameras work a lot better than the shit around today. My dad got a big chunky-looking Canon digital back in the mid-1990s, 1.5 megapixels if I recall, and to this day it takes clearer and more consistently beautiful pictures than any of the three digital cameras I've owned in the past 5 years.

Actually, my use of the classic question-and-answer structure was mean to capture the essence of dialectical reasoning. However, this mode is undercut by the nonsensical and monosyllabic content of its parts, which alludes to the inherent meaninglessness of the form. Minimal differentiation (G- and B-, respectively)…

Gah?
Bah.

Trying to complete an application for a part-time job. Agonizing.

Yes. Yes it does.

@Craig J. Clark

Ah, ya beat me to it, Archmage.

Yeah, the half with all that annoying fresh water and the one-tenth the population trying to drink it.

Yeah, Lanegan's voice is great, and Homme's isn't bad or anything. I'm just saying that it was nice to have some variety on the vocals, unlike now.

His screamy voice was pretty awesome, too. At least it offered a good alternative to Homme's flighty quaver and Mark Lanegan's raspy croon.