Explore our other sites
  • jalopnik
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    avclub-3e9e0f1010418374c3dd9ccf3b0ed27c--disqus
    DTH
    avclub-3e9e0f1010418374c3dd9ccf3b0ed27c--disqus

    I'd be cool with that.

    And here I was hoping that every night, when Jason Isaacs went to sleep, he was waking up in a world where 24 hadn't been rebooted but Heroes had.

    Well this is an interestingly-shaped shotgun Bob Greenblatt's sticking in his mouth…

    Don't worry, if the Book of Job is any indication, if we can endure Heroes being brought back a second time, we will be rewarded with Heroes being cancelled twice as hard the second time. We will experience the sensation of it being unceremoniously yanked off the air twice as intensely as we have ever experienced any

    I just wanted to point out that if you read down the titles of the movies currently listed on the front page, it sounds like it could be one giant movie title:

    Actually, Jeeves didn't approve of their new paisley spats, and resigned.

    Goddamn it, I definitely should have been watching Key and Peele before this.

    You're not insinuating that a Bond film was (gasp) unrealistic, are you? Watch-pistols at dawn, sir!

    This review makes the album seem like it would be quite good, but man, the phrase "seven minutes of hushed, disquieting folk" is a hell of a deterrent, especially for an album that otherwise seems to have a garage-rock aesthetic.

    It's going to be really hard for me to ever again watch About A Boy and feel the smallest bit of sympathy for that kid.

    He just didn't want to say the s-word, because he'd heard that there was a big controversy over a version of Huckleberry Finn that used the word over 219 times.

    Clearly O'Neal hasn't watched Love Actually nearly enough times.

    This is one of those news items that seems like it should be an Onion headline.

    Same here. In fairness, the black card was "_____________. You can't have just one." which was perfect.

    I love how adamant people are about which contestant was "better" in the one show where the audience literally has no first-hand experience of the product. You can hear an Idol contestant hit a bum note, but you can't taste or even smell the dishes. How do we know that Compton was consistently the superior cook when

    Big Pirate Hustlas

    I was disappointed that there was nothing about the serial killer who won the episode of The Dating Game in which he was a contestant.

    Not mad at feminists, I just think that using "get a girl" works as shorthand for "enter a romantic relationship with a woman" and is not necessarily misogynistic. Any comment that gets as worked up over a three-letter word that has long been a part of the cultural vernacular as yours and Miller's is, to me,

    Well, one-third of the way there isn't bad.

    Well, the article title references the common cultural trope that men often attempt to develop romantic relationships with women. Your comment implies that, by referencing this trope, the article was complicit in objectifying women. The obvious conclusion one must draw from your comment is that mentioning the