Yeah, the reviewer definitely meant boor, though it is kind of amusing to think of a drunken gambler sinking a yacht while onlookers sigh wearily and check their pocket watches, waiting for something interesting to happen.

MY BELOVED VANESSA BAYER. NOOOOOOO!

Man, this was well-written and thoughtful and all…but how will I truly know the Cannes experience without the author devoting paragraph upon paragraph about what they had for breakfast or their floridly overwritten musings about Cannes as both festival and concept? It's a real step down from the previous year's…

Only HBO's Animals has the bravery to answer the question, "What if we made The Life and Times of Tim, but made it significantly less funny?"

"For Our Consideration: When Editorial Slides Ass-First into 'Content,' We All Win"

I take it "For Our Consideration" doesn't mean what it used to mean.

Actually, actually

…Why?

More like in case he decided to play "Intern" and bounces her head off the desk, like he did back in 2001. Allegedly.

I just hope that Brzezinski gets padding on allll the desks in their new house.

I don't know which of the films is better. All I know is REBELLIONS ARE BUILT ON HOPE

For Our Consideration: How To Re-Write an EPK Juuuust Enough to Seem Like An Article

Paul Williams (and TAS in general) will always be my definitive Batman…even including the Batman comics I grew up reading.

My heart still bleeds weird blue bile for Danny DeVito's fish eatin', nose bitin' dumpy swamp hobo Penguin.

Hell, I don't why other people like this show, but I damn sure know why I do: It's an absurd burlesque of a superhero show. It started out trying to be grim and serious, but once it got going it embraced its pulpy funnybook origins and stopped taking itself seriously. Now, it's a basically Batman '66 with an…

Aw, I disagree about the way they're playing his transformation. The Riddler is, and will always be, an absurd villain. His motivation is always all over the place. Sometimes a goofy dingus in leotard that really, reaaally wants to get caught. Other times, he's a bloodless serial killer in a natty suit who likes to…

SWEET CRACKERS, NO! The actress in a clearly feminist work doesn't think it's feminist? This completely invalidates the whole enterprise! It might even retroactively taint the extremely, blatantly, kinda-hard-to-miss-it feminist message of the source material! Whatever shall we do?

I must have missed something. Why be mewling shit about an innocent question?

"Did you see that sporting event?" "No, but here's an article by Hinton Als…"

Yeah, yeah, its just a show, et cetera…but, operating theory: The SOL isn't the original recipe SOL, nor are the bots original. Kinga rebuilt a streamlined version of the SOL and decided that, to alter the original experiment as little as possible, she should build replica bots to replace the originals. Which is why…