avclub-354b6db657691a32d14b94a9dfe1780e--disqus
Phallus Chilton
avclub-354b6db657691a32d14b94a9dfe1780e--disqus

Maybe I'm just advanced for my age, but I feel like vague philosophical/romantic angst was more of a sophomore year of college thing; 23 was more the age of nihilistically sitting around in my bachelor cave drinking shitty beer.

That's how I originally interpreted it, and it's so much better that way…

@avclub-f3165be83d2dd835403b494eb7185ce2:disqus , why don't they teach that in health class?

My first though was that they were reviewing some new Dreamworks movie, and that it looked like it really sucked.

Don't worry, according to the comment sections on the articles I've been reading, we have it narrowed down to either OWS or the Saudis.

That's numberwang!

I can do you one better — I saw that movie! And there was plenty of hot plunger-on-nipple action!

The original has Gary Busey in it as the titular character, I believe. I originally thought this woman was a nobody, but it looks like we're dealing with some A-list material here.

So they're trying to compete with Teen Witch? Who would ever really want to try and top that?

@avclub-12a6b31534819f646bd9bf5e8a99756d:disqus If it's a legitimate tree-rape, the tool shed has ways of shutting that whole thing down.

A rose. Is what. You are. To me.

I know what they're trying to say, but when you're writing song lyrics, you're afforded a certain degree of poetic license. What I'm getting at is that you don't need to qualify metaphors, and you definitely don't need to qualify similes. This is why the famous Dylan lyric isn't "Out on your own / like a rolling stone

I hate that song that goes:

They're Vinihilists. They believe in vynull.

I guess I must be dumb
'Cause you had a pocket full of horses
Trojan and some of them NEWS

Hey, I totally agree. I hate it when people verbally attack reviewers, so I'm sorry if this came off as one; in fact, if you're judging by overall quality (as a sane person might), I think you're probably right. I'm just making the case for dicey anthology shows. And for what it's worth, you've actually seen the

I don't know… I understand the points made here, but it's written from the perspective of a skeptic in the sense that none these criticisms seem damning if you're already interested in seeing this. I think that horror/sci-fi/weird-shit anthologies are one of man's greatest inventions, but nobody's kidding themselves

They are bullshit munchers.

Pay $100 or more and you get all the previous rewards plus a Transmogrifier! Also, all the rewards above that as well, since they're pretty much the same thing resting on different faces.