avclub-269c32c42897f617fe805887bbd9c5b4--disqus
Victoria Waterfield
avclub-269c32c42897f617fe805887bbd9c5b4--disqus

It's so much fun watching Siskel and Ebert get really excited about a movie.

ACK!

And Cathy Guisewite, right everyone?

Hey pal, did you get a load of the Ravenclaw?

"When Durmstrang sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems. They’re bringing house elves, they’re bringing dark arts. They’re squibs and some, I assume, are good people."

WRONG! Behold, the glory of the Highway Hi-Fi!

That first excerpt is pretty hot garbage, too. "When I first heard people say 'children need structure', I thought they meant 'structure' literally. But now I know they meant it figuratively."

No one knowing "The Seventh Seal" was painful. That's the one Bergman movie you're supposed to know even if you haven't seen it!

Watch out London, he's Irish!

This has reminded me to rewatch this youtube compilation of Noel Gallagher's best commentary from the Oasis music video compilation DVD:

THE TOILET IS ACTUALLY A TRANSPORTER THAT BEAMS THE SHIT INTO SPACE SO NO ONE NEEDS TO CLEAN IT

That, or they just beam all the dust on the ship out into space once a week.

But transporters can recreate humans perfectly, with only the occasional evil Riker popping out, so unless replicators are significantly crappier to save energy, it wouldn't be a problem to make replicated tomatoes identical to real ones at an atomic level.

One of the many cases where a Futurama episode with the same premise ends up being more realistic.

Do the replicators arrange atoms into different molecules? Or do they rearrange atoms themselves? If it's the former, then every replicator would need a supply of twenty or so different elements just to make food that wouldn't give you a deficiency disease, and just about every other element out there to make any

When he was the George Clinton who lived from 1739 to 1812.

No one's going to read this, but I'll post it anyway.

Sinbad O'Connor!

Even though I remember enjoying the Nancy Drew books, I refuse to watch this gritty reboot until someone tells me whether or not this version of Nancy Drew gets results.

I'm definitely rooting for her to take five. She was so good that I've completely forgiven her for the one thing she did that always annoys me when a contestant does it, which is to use their talk with Alex to tell him about their quirky marriage proposal.