I don't think we're allowed to use that word anymore.

Yo Aziz! Say something funny!

I have two boys, and yes, 'stiffies' happen even earlier than 5. but a five year old getting a matchbox car into their tiny, tiny butt hole? VERY VERY unlikely, I would say impossible except that I guess nothing is 'impossible.' But Occam's Razor, this letter is fake as fuck.

RMMMM TRRPPPPPPD N RRRTM VRSSSTRBBRLLL, WTH JLLLLL GOODRRRCHRRRRRR!

Ligotti's humdrum and cliched "philosophy" was elevated by the dramatization created by Pizzolatto. The actual philosophy is not at issue here: it's nothing new, and not particularly interesting on its own. I don't consider this plagiarism.

yes. yes, he could!

"George, are you coming to bed? I taped Mad About You!!"

Someone needs to do one of these on Watcher in the Woods.

Last week was the worst. "IF YOU MISS THIS EPISODE, YOU WILL HATE YOURSELF THE NEXT DAY!!!!" or something like that.

No. Someone who murders a defenseless woman by shooting her full of bolts from a crossbow, just for shits and giggles, loses their right to be called a 'person'. That is a monster, and monsters do not deserve respect even in death. Same goes for Ramsay Snow.

Lovitz shows up on another episode later in the series too.  He's a super loser that Rachel goes on a date with.  I'm not sure if he's supposed to be the same character or not.

2 Fast 2 Metheus

Delicate…like a flower
I said 'what-what?'

Delicate…like a flower
I said 'what-what?'

Maybe they should call it Girl Meets Void, it could be an exploration of a young person's descent into DMT experimentation.

Maybe they should call it Girl Meets Void, it could be an exploration of a young person's descent into DMT experimentation.

Pleasant but hacky.  It really is not very good. 

Pleasant but hacky.  It really is not very good. 

I have to agree with Dan on the polyamory debate.  It's not an orientation; it's a choice.  I, and many, many other men, would love to be polyamorous.  I'd love to bang every attractive chick I come across (if they'd have me, of course), and maybe have relationships with several.  But I choose to be monogamous because…

I have to agree with Dan on the polyamory debate.  It's not an orientation; it's a choice.  I, and many, many other men, would love to be polyamorous.  I'd love to bang every attractive chick I come across (if they'd have me, of course), and maybe have relationships with several.  But I choose to be monogamous because…