Yes. Yes he was.

Everyone Sorkin writes is socially awkward because Sorkin is socially awkward.

Everyone Sorkin writes is socially awkward because Sorkin is socially awkward.

As someone mentioned before (after? I can't follow the timeline), he is basically George Lucas now.

As someone mentioned before (after? I can't follow the timeline), he is basically George Lucas now.

No. Well, except for the rant in the very first episode. But basically all he said then was "you're not as smart as you think you are."

No. Well, except for the rant in the very first episode. But basically all he said then was "you're not as smart as you think you are."

I will not be satisfied until it is a love dodecahedron.

I will not be satisfied until it is a love dodecahedron.

In fairness, so much of what Sorkin does himself is a call to arms against things he hates, so you should be hardly surprised when his work engenders similar reactions.

In fairness, so much of what Sorkin does himself is a call to arms against things he hates, so you should be hardly surprised when his work engenders similar reactions.

I find Maggie's face horrifying on so many levels.

I find Maggie's face horrifying on so many levels.

If the cast of this show does not include Nathan Fillion, Amy Acker, Eliza Dushku, Jewel Staite and James Marsters, I refuse to watch it.

If the cast of this show does not include Nathan Fillion, Amy Acker, Eliza Dushku, Jewel Staite and James Marsters, I refuse to watch it.

So, the great gigantic triumph of "Newsnight 2.0" was, in effect, to call the Tea Party poopyheads??

So, the great gigantic triumph of "Newsnight 2.0" was, in effect, to call the Tea Party poopyheads??

Wait, wait, wait. Hang on a second.

Wait, wait, wait. Hang on a second.

I actually liked Battlefield Earth, but this is undoubtedly and absolutely true.