I recognize I'm arguing against self-interest here. That's fine. I'm trying to play the game the right way.

I believe James Clement was the last digger on the show.

When this was announced as double-Tribal, I assumed it was Himbo Holocaust week.  Am glad it didn't work out that way.

It was announced a combined reward/immunity challenge, so I'm inclined to give the points.

The book could've used some trimming. But it's worth anyone's time.

Shyamalan is a better director, Smith is a much better writer.

Oh, you saw COLOR OF NIGHT too?

Or Glass says he's rigged Franklin Field to blow up, and you can't stop me, and no one will ever believe you … fifteen-minute action sequence to end the film properly.

I hear they're making a prequel to that called THE PENULTIMATE AIRBENDER.

I remember watching JUDGMENT AT NUREMBERG in college, and thinking to myself, "Jesus … Dorothy got big."

Remember that for The Wizard of Oz, the studio made Judy Garland tape her breasts down so she'd look closer to 12 than 16.

Joan Fontaine and Olivia de Havilland want to reassure you that they are still alive, and not on speaking terms.

It's a pretty remarkable story, and Jeanine Basinger's THE STAR MACHINE tells it well.  At age 21, the studios made her the highest-paid woman in America; by the end of the decade she was willing to give up Hollywood altogether, and never came back.

There's a lengthy passage in Toure's new book on Prince outlining just how many of his songs portray himself as a sexually inexperienced man being challenged by an experienced woman and, in every case, Prince rises to the occasion. ("I guess I must be dumb, cause she had a pocket full of horses — Trojan, and some of…

certainly could be.

What about A BLAFFAIR TO REMEMBLACK?

If it's a white Daddy Warbucks, this just becomes Diff'rent Strokes: The Musical.  I like the idea of making it a hip-hop icon who lost touch with The Streets instead.

Chief Suspect: the wacky dancing tutor.

@avclub-036525b1dd66c5fc08a5220edc7f18eb:disqus it can still be criminal, even if it had no effect on the outcome.

1. There's no way you could fit 30,000 ballots in a box like that, or that a single polling place would ever even have that many voters.
2. If those returns are so statistically anomalous, then that probably ends the inquiry. (You'd also look at the ballots themselves, and whether they match up with actual voters, etc.…